WWW.HUBERT-BRUNE.DE
Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz  Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz  Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz

<= [1061][1062][1063][1064][1065][1066][1067][1068][1069][1070] =>

Jahr  S. E. 
 2001 *  1
 2002 *  1
 2003 *  1
 2004 *  3
 2005 *  2
 2006 *  2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 0  
2010 56
2011 80
2012 150
2013 80
2014 230
2015 239
2016 141
 
S.
1
2
3
6
8
10
12
14
14
70
150
300
380
610
849
990
 
P. Z.
 
100%
50%
100%
33,33%
25%
20%
16,67%
 
400%
114,29%
100%
26,67%
60,53%
39,18%
16,61%
 
S.E. (S.)
T. (S.)
0,0039
0,0032
0,0030
0,0044
0,0047
0,0048
0,0049
0,0050
0,0044
0,0198
0,0384
0,0702
0,0819
0,1219
0,1581
0,1726
 
K.  
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
4
0  
158
97
246
169
1614
1580
1949
 
S.
1
2
3
6
8
10
12
16
16
174
271
517
686
2300
3880
5829
 
P. Z.
 
100%
50%
100%
33,33%
25%
20%
33,33%
 
987,50%
55,75%
90,77%
32,69%
235,28%
60,70%
50,23%
 
  K.  
S. E.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
2,82
1,21
1,64
2,11
7,02
6,61
13,82
 
  K.  
T.
0,0039
0,0027
0,0027
0,0082
0,0055
0,0055
0,0055
0,0109
0
0,4328
0,2658
0,6721
0,4630
4,4219
4,3288
5,3251
 
 K. (S.) 
S.E. (S.)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,143
1,143
2,486
1,807
1,723
1,805
3,770
4,570
5,888
 
K. (S.)
T. (S.)
0,0039
0,0032
0,0030
0,0044
0,0047
0,0048
0,0049
0,0057
0,0050
0,0491
0,0693
0,1210
0,1479
0,4596
0,7227
1,0116
* Von 2001 bis 2006 nur Gästebuch, erst ab 2007 auch Webforen und Weblogs.

NACH OBEN 1061) Arminius, 01.10.2017, 16:07 (6510)

6510

Mithus wrote:

„Is that you, Arminius?“ **

No.

I am this of course:

Arminius

 

NACH OBEN 1062) Arminius, 02.10.2017, 00:20 (6511)

6511

James S. Saint wrote

„I just knew he had dark blue eyes.“ **

A good one.

Notice the dark blue eyes !

(The similarities are purely coincidental, by the way.)

Mags J. wrote:

„That is not how I pictured you look at all, Arminius.“ **

Why? I mean how did you picture my look then?

Mags J. wrote:

„You been taking advantage of the clubbing facilities? I hope so.“ **

Yes. But being like „SAM“, San Jaime (...) is for all guests here in this area.

 

NACH OBEN 1063) Arminius, 03.10.2017, 22:53 (6512)

6512

Brando wrote:

„With Vico man could understand what he himself produces. In art the range of this is wider than in science. So truth in art is deeper than in science. With a philosophy of technique like that of Gotthard Günther things are different. But transclassic logic must be applied to science, to get Vicos Claim even in science.“ **

But truth is not always deeper in art than in science.

 

NACH OBEN 1064) Arminius, 04.10.2017, 01:00 (6513)

6513

What is your self-evaluation?

SUBJECTIVE: 1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9__10
OBJECTIVE : 1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9__10

 

NACH OBEN 1065) Arminius, 05.10.2017, 22:05 (6514)

6514

I mean that life makes sense in a cultural way, because culture is something that is started and stopped by the cultural beings themselves.

 

NACH OBEN 1066) Arminius, 06.10.2017, 12:56 (6515)

6515

Also, destruction can make sense too, at least to certain humans.

 

NACH OBEN 1067) Arminius, 07.10.2017, 21:34 (6516)

6516

We are both natural and cultural.

 

NACH OBEN 1068) Arminius, 08.10.2017, 16:25 (6517)

6517

By the way: I have nothing to do with this account.

 

NACH OBEN 1069) Arminius, 09.10.2017, 23:24 (6518)

6518


Although I do not know you (**) very much, I guess that your self-evaluation is an honest one.

 

NACH OBEN 1070) Arminius, 10.10.2017, 18:27 (6519)

6519

 

X says: „I am more subjective than objective“.
By saying this, is X really „more subjective than objective“?

Y says: „I am more objective than subjective“.
By saying this, is Y really „more objective than subjective“?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

And does „really“ here really mean „objectively“?
Isn't objectivity most similar to reality?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also, what if X and Y are liars?
Would that not be similar to the Liar Paradox of the Cretan Epimenides who maintains that all Cretans lie.

 

==>

 

NACH OBEN

www.Hubert-Brune.de

 

 

WWW.HUBERT-BRUNE.DE

 

NACH OBEN