WWW.HUBERT-BRUNE.DE
Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz  Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz  Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz

<= [931][932][933][934][935][936][937][938][939][940] =>

Jahr  S. E. 
 2001 *  1
 2002 *  1
 2003 *  1
 2004 *  3
 2005 *  2
 2006 *  2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 0  
2010 56
2011 80
2012 150
2013 80
2014 230
2015 239
2016 141
 
S.
1
2
3
6
8
10
12
14
14
70
150
300
380
610
849
990
 
P. Z.
 
100%
50%
100%
33,33%
25%
20%
16,67%
 
400%
114,29%
100%
26,67%
60,53%
39,18%
16,61%
 
S.E. (S.)
T. (S.)
0,0039
0,0032
0,0030
0,0044
0,0047
0,0048
0,0049
0,0050
0,0044
0,0198
0,0384
0,0702
0,0819
0,1219
0,1581
0,1726
 
K.  
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
4
0  
158
97
246
169
1614
1580
1949
 
S.
1
2
3
6
8
10
12
16
16
174
271
517
686
2300
3880
5829
 
P. Z.
 
100%
50%
100%
33,33%
25%
20%
33,33%
 
987,50%
55,75%
90,77%
32,69%
235,28%
60,70%
50,23%
 
  K.  
S. E.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
2,82
1,21
1,64
2,11
7,02
6,61
13,82
 
  K.  
T.
0,0039
0,0027
0,0027
0,0082
0,0055
0,0055
0,0055
0,0109
0
0,4328
0,2658
0,6721
0,4630
4,4219
4,3288
5,3251
 
 K. (S.) 
S.E. (S.)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,143
1,143
2,486
1,807
1,723
1,805
3,770
4,570
5,888
 
K. (S.)
T. (S.)
0,0039
0,0032
0,0030
0,0044
0,0047
0,0048
0,0049
0,0057
0,0050
0,0491
0,0693
0,1210
0,1479
0,4596
0,7227
1,0116
* Von 2001 bis 2006 nur Gästebuch, erst ab 2007 auch Webforen und Weblogs.

NACH OBEN 931) Arminius, 11.10.2016, 14:11, 14:14, 16:19 (5395-5397)

5395

When will the last one be fired?

5396

Copied post in another thread.

5397

It is possible that Schiller meant both an ideal man and an ideal human (both as something like the last guideline of each human’s will) in each human. Accordance of both reason/morality and freedom is the task/purpose.

 

NACH OBEN 932) Arminius, 12.10.2016, 18:06, 18:43 (5398-5399)

5398

Amazing androids: **.

5399

Machines like that androids (**) can use the language, but they do not know much about it.

Arminius wrote:

„Amazing androids: **.“ ** **

Emotions can be shown by machines like those androids (**), but they do not know its meaning well enough.

 

NACH OBEN 933) Arminius, 14.10.2016, 02:41, 16:02, 16:21, 16:36, 17:59, 18:40, 18:49, 19:01, 19:29, 20:01, 22:15 (5400-5410)

5400

Socratus wrote:

„Where did the universe get all this energy?

(, . . . . . . . from NOTHING . . . .
NOTHING is ITSELF some kind of INFINITE ENERGY. )

My conclusion.
If everything was created from a Nothing then this Nothing can be some
kind of God. The God can be the scientific Nothing.“ **

I remind you of this:

Arminius wrote:

„Socratus wrote:

»›Although we are used to thinking of empty space as containing nothing at all, and therefore having zero energy, the quantum rules say that there is some uncertainty about this. Perhaps each tiny bit of the vacuum actually contains rather a lot of energy.‹«“ **

Then it would not be nothing.“ ** **

Socratus wrote:

»›If the vacuum contained enough energy, it ....‹« **

It would not be nothing.“ ** **

5401

A „p-zombie“ (**)?

5402

Science has created many gods. Some are already „dead“, some are still „alive“. The number of gods has increased (thus: not decreased!).

Which „scientific god“ do you prefer?

Or do you think that all these „gods“ are no „real gods“ or „true gods“ but merely „false gods“?

5403

Maybe some of the said relevant events will happen at about the same time, so that the most people will not notice each event.

5404

That reminds me of the following two responds I posted in your other thread:

Arminius wrote:

„It is certainly no coincidence that two similar beliefs occured and became dogmas at the same time: (1) the belief that the big bank can create the money out of nothing; (2) the bielef that the big bang can create the universe out of nothing.“ ** **

Arminius wrote:

„Socratus wrote:

»Arminius wrote:

›Because the 'great amount of information' is only capable of explaining the medium or averarge issues, but not other issues like the beginning or the end of the 'small Information'. The 'small Information' is possibly too 'small' (simple) for explaining it. The example 'homo sapiens' makes it clear, I think: Humans often do not have many answers to the simpliest questions of their own dasein. Why are humans in the world?‹ ** **

So, we can have only ›the medium or average issues‹ of information.«“ **

Assumed that there is macrophysics, mesophysics, and microphysics, I would say that we can know much about mesophysics, which is - by the way - the main part of physics, but not much about macro- and microphysics, namely something about the beginning and ending of the universe or of the so called »quantum world«. I guess that micro- and macrophysics are more like metaphysics than physics, because almost everything they deal with is - more or less - theoretical, mathematical, logical, just metaphysical, thus philosophical.“ ** **

5405

Objects must be objectified, and that can only be done by a subject.

According to that one must say that subjects (or a subject or „the“ subject) came before objects (or an object or „the“ object).

I think the problem of the subject/object-dualism is - at last - not solvable.

5406

Maybe there will happen some relevant events (for example the collapse of the Keynesianistic/Neo-Keynesianistic system [„fiat“ money system], a disaster as a consequence of the global war, a natural disaster, the take-over of the androids) at almost the same time.

5407

And, perhaps, at last the whole planet ....

5408

History is not dead. At least: Not yet.

Compare: ** **.

5409

If they merely did that one thing (defining „God“), then they would not remain so dependent from money as they are. Defining „God“ requires less money than a „Very Large Telescope“ or a „Large Hadron Collider“.

5410

For example the collapse of the Keynesianistic/Neo-Keynesianistic system [„fiat“ money system], a disaster as a consequence of the global war, a natural disaster, the take-over of the machines.

 

NACH OBEN 934) Arminius, 16.10.2016, 01:06, 01:10, 01:12, 01:26, 14:54, 14:57, 15:29, 15:48, 16:01, 16:32, 16:37 (5411-5421)

5411

„We“ did not kill all gods, it is the other way around: more gods have been invented since „our“ one God was murdered by „us“ (in the last 18th century). Scientific gods, economic gods, political gods, pop gods and many other gods are the most and the youngest gods (false gods).

5412

It seems that some people are talking as if nothing would be everything - so as if black would be white, right (correct) would be left (wrong, false), war would be peace, ... and so on.

5413

A common enemy unites the people.

5414

Do you mean the combination of US Dollar and US Military? The „buy or-die“ system?

5415

Why are they now so (seemingly) sure to win? It is beacuse of the current „weakness“ (caused by some media headlines) of Trump. Isn't it?

5416

James S. Saint wrote:

„Prismatic 567 wrote:

»So what happened before anyone was alive?
Only a human can answer the above and no other living things [at least at the present].
The moment the human answer the question, is a human-made answer.
Thus the answer is interdependent with a human mind.

There cannot be any thing that happened or existed interdependently before humans existed.« **

Emmm ..., no. Logic and language do not work that way.

A monkey could have given the same answer and it still be true. Truth merely requires alignment with reality. It doesn't matter which language is used, nor when any asserted facts were to take place. Logic allows for both prediction of future and of past. No one has to have existed in either case for the predicted assertions to be true. And it doesn't matter who said them or even if they were intentionally spoken by a conscious being. A man need not be on the far side of the Moon to accurately state that there is dust there. Nor need there be a man present a billion years ago for a man to accurately and truthfully state that the Earth existed at that time.“ **

Yes, and this statement would also be right, if a well known scientist went to the far side of the Moon and said "I have evidence for the fact that there is no dust there". Science has to do with two sides of its "coin": theory (logic, language) and empirism (scientific practice, experience) - both connected with deduction and induction. In that said example they would have to go on with visiting the far side of the Moon and perhaps change some physical and chemical theories or fire the said well known scientist.

5417

Oh, yes, it makes much sense to ban drugs, especially to the drug bosses, drug dealers, and the whole mafia system.

5418

Pandora wrote:

Global Reserve Currencies

**

That diagram (**) shows which empire has been existing since Bretton Woods: the US Dollar Empire.

Even the other strong currencies like Deutsche Mark (DM), what is now called „Euro“ (and does not really work), or Yen support the US Dollar Empire.

Would you, please, name the source of that diagram?

At the end of 1990 it was like this:
US Dollar: 428.8 US $ (55%).
Deutsche Mark (DM): 160.9 US $ (21%).
Yen: 75.0 US $ (10%).
Pound Sterling: 24.3 US $ (3%).
French Franc: 15.4 US $ (2%).
Swiss Franken: 14.5 US $ (2%).
Dutch Gulden: 8.5 US $ (1%).
...

5419

Not all scientists accept the quark theory and the string theories, and the others do it because of their interests and, of course, because of the fact that they are just theorists.

5421

Ierrelus, if it is true that you are now 74 years old and still smoke, then I ask you: Did you never have some problems because of your smoking when you were some years younger?

5421

Hahaha wrote:

„Pandora wrote:

»You'd have to dethrone the US dollar first.« **

Everybody around the world is sick to death of American imperialism and global hegemony.

I'm surprised it took the world this long to start getting cocky. Duerte has mentioned that Obama should go fuck himself repeatedly in public. Any man that says that publicly has my respect.“ **

That is true.

„Pandora wrote:

»You'd have to dethrone the US dollar first.“ **

That is true tooo.

Hahaha wrote:

„Pandora wrote:

»You'd have to dethrone the US dollar first. Gadaffi tried that and was taken out. And Lybia is still in the middle of civil war. How can you prevent a civil war? As I can see, only in a dictatorship could you do it before. Now, a dictator is an oppressor of human rights and has to be deposed, and that leaves any country vulnerable to destabilization and breaking up. And the free flow of dollar across the globe facilitates that. I wouldn't be surprised if Philippines plunged into a civil war of its own.“ **

If you bothered paying attention to the world markets you would understand that the dollar is currently in the process of being dethroned. Indeed within time the world will see that the king emperor has no clothes.“ **

That is true too.

 

NACH OBEN 935) Arminius, 18.10.2016, 04:39, 04:49, 14:49, 15:08, 15:13, 15:31, 16:06, 16:14, 18:44, 22:19, 23:01 (5422-5432)

5422

Do you (**) really want to give up smoking or not?

5423

The system of US Dollar and US Military has not much to do with democracy.

5424

Ah, your pubescent self description again. Thanks.

5425

Thank you (**).

5426

The Remnimbi (Yuan) was pegged to the US Dollar some years ago.

In 2015 the IMF declared the Remnimbi (Yuan) as the fifth reserve currency after US Dollar, Euro (Deutsche Mark), Yen, Pound Sterling.

5427

What did they do when they wanted to come into war? Think, for example, of the USS Maine (1898), the RMS Lusitania (1915), Pearl Harbour (1941), Tongking (1964) ... and so on. .... Psst .... Top secret.

5428

There are three possibilities: (1) she does not know what she is talking about, (2) she is one of the most dangerous human beings, (3) both (1 and 2).

5429

In fact: That „no-fly zone“ (**) means a war with Syria and Russia!

5430

You (**) are a hopeless case. Q.E.D.

Try to speak to another ILP member, I am not interested in your lies, fakes, trolling acts ....

Try to accept facts, and one fact is that I am not interested in your stupid pubescent lies, fakes, trolling acts ....

I do not want to repeat all this again and again.

You are looking for the next warning, I know.

But, please, stop doing it in my precense.

5431

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Grzrfl56Yf0 (**).

5432

Why does the media each of the trillionaires and billionaires call a „philantrope“?

 

NACH OBEN 936) Arminius, 20.10.2016, 02:17, 02:19, 16:00, 16:12, 16:23, 17:09, 18:12, 18:15, 18:23, 18:50, 18:57 (5433-5443)

5433

Only those of the American Natives who survived. 10 millions of the American Natives were killed by US „citizens“.

5434

Autsider wrote:

„The example I had in mind was 2 groups of 10 people. In 1st group each of the ten people would be specialized in one area of their interest and thus extremely productive in that area both qualitatively and quantitatively, and all people would cooperate and exchange whatever they have. In the 2nd group there is no cooperation and everybody becomes a jack-of-all trades but master of none. For the sake of simplicity, say it is an ancient society and the areas of interest are jobs like blacksmith, hunter, tailor, cook, etc. In the first group where everybody cooperates, that group's hunter/blacksmith/etc. would be superior in hunting skill to all members of the other group, because the only thing he has to do and does, is hunt, whereas in the other group everybody hunts but nobody is exceptionally proficient at it. The same goes for every profession. Now say that each person has the capacity to produce 10 items they need. This would mean that in the first group, a hunter would produce 10 items of meat, a blacksmith 10 items of equipment, etc. etc. But because they are proficient at it, all of those items would be of higher quality than the items of the second group. And in the second group each person has to do a little bit of everything, so it is all poorly done, as everybody has to hunt their own meat, produce their own equipment, etc. The advantage of the first group is general higher quality of goods, so they are more prosperous. The advantage of the second group, however, would be that all the members are independent of one another, whereas in the first group all the members are highly dependent on one another. So in the case that the social order breaks apart and each member is forced to fend for themselves there is a higher possibility they might not be able to do so.

But I think that the 2nd group example is also an unrealistic one because if the members of the second group don't cooperate, the members of the first group would conquer them easily. And if they didn't cooperate they would possibly try to kill one another too, instead of just staying out of each other's way.“ **

Yes, but your 1st group example is also an unrealistic one, because in every group there are always some who live at the cost of the others, and this fact is called the tragedy of the commons (compare my post in your other thread [**|**).

5435

Beer contains less alcohol than wine and cider. So banning beer would makde no sense, if wine and cider were not banned too.

Ban no one of them.

5436

Cheers.

5437

Why did you open this thread in the „SGE“ subforum?

5438

Linguistically said a predicate is what the subject does (in your example: seeing and interpreting), either without or with a connection to an object (in your example: with). Concerning the interpretation of any object, a subject is relatively free. But this does not prove or disprove that the subject dominates the object or that there is an object at all.

The problem of the subject/object dualism is not solvable.

5439

Thank you (**) for the information.

5440

And the gods shall replace the trillionaires and billionaires?

5441

Both the firebomb (**) and the spray (**) because of Trump, or because of the Republicans, or because of both?

5442

Jill Stein is a member of the „Green Party“, and that party was founded in 1991.

In my country the „Greens“ were founded in the 1970s, and in the 1990s they had already overtaken all other parties in being evil.

So let me tell you that there is no hope at all for the global problems when it comes to such allegedly „green“ parties. It is just the other way around.

5443

Think of Al Gore.

 

NACH OBEN 937) Arminius, 22.10.2016, 02:36, 02:38, 02:41, 02:42, 02:43, 02:44, 02:47, 02:47, 02:50, 03:15, 03:26 (5444-5454)

5444

It is all about declaration of war on all Non-moslems.

5445

The gods will not replace the trillionaires, but „the trillionaires will become the gods“ (**)?

Oh, my God!

Seriously, yes, that can become true in some way. I have said something similar about it in another thread.

5446

A country in which „anything can happen that's conceivable“ (**) is very dangerous.

5447

Absolutely right. If randomness could be designed, then it would be no randomness.

5448

No.

Do you need a scapegoat?

5449

Legalize all drugs and ban all mafia.

5450

Yes (**).

Https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/Phoc96v1.jpg (**).

5451

It is not easy for you to give up smoking. Right?

When I - as a moderate or average smoker - gave up smoking in 2005, I first did not intend to give it up but to just smoke less, and after some weeks I smoked merely a very few cigarettes, then I thought „if so, then I can also smoke no cigarettes“. The whole process took merely some weeks. It began without the intention of giving it all up, and then it just happened with a little help of my friend: logic.

5452

Yes, that is absoluetly right. There are also a lot of ILP members (as you also know) who depend on the „nazi killer argument“, because they have no real arguments.

So their motto is: „Everyone who disagrees with me is Hitler a nazi“.

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/67466979.jpg

5453

Legalize all jokes.

5454

No. It was a motivational thought or a suggestion - but not meant as seriously as one may think.

 

NACH OBEN 938) Arminius, 24.10.2016, 02:44, 02:46, 15:21, 15:57, 16:08, 19:36, 21:56, 22:01, 22:07, 22:14, 22:53 (5455-5465)

5455

Yes, that’s right. Existence is not observation.

5456

Yup.

5457

Who will win? What do you estimate? And why?

My assumption was and mostly still is that Trump is made to look silly in order to make Clinton's victory more possible. But that is a risk too. So I am not sure about the election result.

5458

James S. Saint wrote:

„The absence is not the opposite.“ **

Yes. This is what I have always said, especially in the case of theism and its absence, which is atheism, whereas the opposite of theism is antitheism. So atheism is not the opposite of theism.

Arminius wrote:

„Those who oppose theists and theism are antitheists. Antitheism (thus: not atheism) is the opposite of theism.“ ** **

5459

But you (**) still smoke.

5460

One should never trust the media.

Humans themselves are already media: So they know to lie successfully.

5461

Waechter 418 wrote:

„For example: we still do use (voluntarily or not) a software that was designed 3000 years ago by shepherds in the middle eastern deserts.

Not 3000 but 6000 years ago, beacuse the urbanization began about 6000 years ago.

5462

The „hardware“ has not changed much, but the „software“ has changed very much.

5463

Do you mean „brainwashing“ when you use the word „software“?

5464

Yea. Ii is the Occidental-modern version of o distraction from rebellion against the emperor (Caesar).

5465

„Observation“ is something that happens and requires a subject and an object. If a subject observes itself, then it is both the subject and the object. „Existence“ refers to something that is, regardless whether it happens or not, and does not require a subject or an object, because it tells us merely about the fact whether something is or not.

 

NACH OBEN 939) Arminius, 26.10.2016, 01:02, 01:05, 01:07, 01:08, 18:34, 19:09, 19:18, 20:12, 20:37, 20:44, 21:10 (5466-5476)

5466

One can also use the follwoing wording: Not everything that exists is observable, but everything that is observable exists.

5467

Autsider wrote:

„TFM says in this video (**) that survival in the sense of what I call long-term survival (genetic propagation) is irrelevant because we don't, really, survive to any relevant extent, as our genes become extremely diluted only after a few generations. He didn't mention the specific numbers himself, but since parents pass on approximately 50% of genes to their child, already by the 2nd generation only half of you survives. The 3rd generation, 25%. By the tenth generation, which is only about 200-300 years, the percentage of you which survives is reduced to below 1%. And ultimately none of that matters and it will be reduced to 0% because scientists predict that just as the Big Bang happened, there will be an opposite, a Big Crunch. So whereas Big Bang was an expansion of a singularity into a universe, a big crunch would be the universe contracting back into a singularity, and erasing all life. If that doesn't exterminate us humans, something like the explosion of the sun, or shortage of water and food, or pollution, or nuclear war or some other thing will.

So the question then becomes - Do you really have a reason to give a shit about reproducing your genes and caring about the evolutionary process, when the evolutionary process itself will eventually be extinguished when all life on earth goes extinct. It becomes more personal - what do you want? Is it worth it to give up a portion of your life to make and possibly care for offspring, or not?“ **

Most people do not think for the long term but merely for the short term.

5468

It is more probable that the said liar in your example (**) convinces the objective one easier than the subjective one. An objective one wants to know what the subjective one denies - objectivity -, and the liar has to refer to objectivity in order to be successful and is part of objectivity to the other two, the listeners, thus also to the subjective one who denies objectivity.

5469

Yesteryear the emperors already knew who is going to become the new president of the US.

5470

I am not a subjectivist. I can guarantee you (**).

It is just true that it is easier for a liar to conivince an objectivist than a subjetivist. You have to be intelligent enough if you want to resist a lie. Children, for example, can be convinced so easily just because they want to become great objectivists - at least normally. They want to know everything about reality. And if they have a teacher who is a liar, then they believe in his lies - at least normally. A dictatorship, regardless whether it is called a „democracy“ or not, works in the same way.

You have totally misunderstood me and reacted too spontaneously, too impulsively, too presumptuously, too unintelligently.

5471

Yes (**). If he had read only some of our posts and given up his presumptuousness, then he would or at least should have known it.

5472

Both subjectivity and objectivity have to be learned.

5473

First of all I do not have to explain myself.

Nobody comes into life as a subjectivist or an objectivist. In order to become one of the both or no one of the both subjectivity and objectivity must be learned. This process begins in the womb.

What do the words „subject“ and „object“ mean originally? From here you have to begin with your research. The next thing is the development of the human object of your research. Then ask yourself: „How does a human being come into life and learn, especially learn the difference between subject and object?“ Look at the test with the mirror. As a very little child one learns to recognize oneself in a mirror.

So if we want to continue our converastion here, then we have to define the words „subject“ and „object“, because it is possible that you have other definitions than I have.

In order to know what a „subject“ is, one must at least have a self-concept; and in order to know what an „object“ is, one must be capable of istinguishing between the own self and the rest (which is outside of the own self).

Tactility already exists when the human embryo is 2 months old, taste already exists when the human fetus is 3 months old, smell already exists when the human fetus is 5 months old, hearing already exists when the human fetus is 6 months old, seeing already exists when the human fetus is 9 months old.

The sense of balance needs more time and starts when the human embryo is 2 months old.

But do you think that the embryo or the fetus is capable of distinguishing between the own self and the rest (which is outside of the own self)?

5474

Pandora wrote:

„I think that active government officials should not be allowed to have a family of their own since a family would make them vulnerable to exploitation, and that would constitute a threat to national welfare and security.“ **

Who should control that? Those who are really ruling and have incest families?

5475

If so (**), then they have achieved progress: from a five-years-plan to a ten-years-plan.

5476

White and male president => black and male president => white and female president => black and female president. This could be the secret rule of the real rulers, if they want more unassailable presidents. If so: who will be the president after Hillary Clinton?

(Oh, I just noticed Hillary Clinton's birthday: 26.10.1947 - happy birthday!)

 

NACH OBEN 940) Arminius, 28.10.2016, 00:36, 04:52, 04:57, 15:01, 16:05, 16:17, 16:29, 16:40, 18:12, 18:19, 18:25, 18:52, 19:24, 19:32, 19:42, 19:44, 19:47, 20:05, 20:17, 20:37, 20:44, 21:35, 22:02 (5477-5499)

5477

No. You (**) are wrong and have nothing to contribute to this thread. So, please, look for another thread.

Humans can live without any natural environment, because they can live in an artificial environment which is made by themselves. They can live on their own „absolute islands“ - thus: without any natural environment.

Arminius wrote:

„The ISS is such an »absolute island«. There is no natural environment inside the ISS, everything is human-made, thus artificial (cultural), even the air that the humans breathe. So the environment inside the ISS is an absolutely artificial (cultural) environment. The natural environment is completely outside the ISS. If there were a natural environment inside the ISS, then the humans who are inside the ISS would immediately die.

N., P.

Absolute Insel (Beispiel: ISS)

There are more than this human-made »islands«, some are absolute, for example spaceships or the ISS, the others are relative, for example the atmospheric »islands«:

Atmosphärische Inseln Atmosphärische Inseln

** **

If you live in an artificial environment like the ISS, the natural environment is even deadly for you. An astronaut is immediately dead after leaving the ISS (artificial environment) without any other artificial environment (at least the astronaut suit).

5478

Yes, that's ok (**). How many cigarrettes do you smoke per day?

5479

Welcome to the non-smoking club then (**).

Funny thing - in fact.

You want to smoke and drink again. Right?

5480

Yes, banning beer would be the worst case scenario.

5481

Spätzle, chicken, salad. Drinking: grape juice.

5482

I can imagine.

Do you (**) think that you will overcome the urge of the part of you that wants to smoke and drink?

When I gave up cigarettes (more than eleven years ago) I did not have any urge or demand or desire to smoke or to drink. Perhaps it was just the fact that the time of giving up cigarettes had come; so it was easy to do it.

5483

Do you know what Spätzle is?

5484

Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:

„People do stupid shit and commit crimes when they drink beer. But you never heard of someone assaulting someone while high on weed.“ **

That is not true.

5485

Or SpaghettILP (**).

5486

Is this thread (**) a further episode of the super-thread „What are you doing?“?

5487

Carleas, do or did you smoke?

Be honest!

5488

Noodles. The best noodles on earth (**).

5489

Spätzle with Zwiebelrostbraten (Zwiebel-rost-braten), roasted / grilled / fried beef and onions in gravy.

5490

Spätzle with cheese and onions.

5491

Haselnuß-Spätzle (hazelnut-spätzle).

5492

Home made Knöpfle type Spätzle.

5493

So, do you now know what Spätzle is?

5494

Carleas wrote:

„I've never been addicted to cigarettes, though I've smoked many at varying frequencies throughout my adult life. I'm not sure why, but even when I would chain-smoke for weeks to get through finals, I had no problem stopping and no cravings afterward.

I do struggle with drinking, but I come from a family with a lot of alcoholism so I knew before I started that it was something to watch out for, and that vigilance has helped me keep it in check (mostly). Weed has been similar, though it's a lot less worrying as an addiction.

My worst addictions are fortunately fairly benign: TV, video games, internet trash. They're limiting, but they're also fairly socially acceptable. But as cravings they feel the same way booze feels: the need, the tug, the surge of blessed dopamine, the "just one more". And the prospect of quitting feels like breaking up, like losing a friend or family member, a part of my identity.

Thankfully, they won't kill me, they just stunt my personal and professional development.“ **

If you really can stop smoking so easily, why do you not stop smoking?

5495

She (**) is megalomaniac.

5496

It is a difference whether a heterosexual white man, a heterosexaul black man, a homosexual white man, a homosexual black man, a heterosexual white woman, a heterosexual black woman, a homosexual white woman, or a a homosexual black woman wants the war and says this publicly.

5497

Copied post in another thread.

5498

Soon it will be possible to carry the zygote, the embryo, and the fetus in an extrauterine way. Then we will have totally arrived at the point of the more insecure, the more primitve reproduction again. We will no longer need any intrauterine thing then.

The natural womb as the realization of the the natural idea to lay the egg into the inside of the body will have become obsolete. There will be no natural birth any longer, since the natural uterus will not be needed any longer. Humans will not be needed any longer - their natural reproduction will be replaced by genetic engineering and artificial „wombs“, their economical production will be replaced by machines (**|**) and perhaps by artificial humans (cyborgs) .... So humans will either become artificial humans or die out.

5499

Mr. Reasonable wrote:

„I don't care how many parties we have. I'm more concerned with the quality of life available to people here.“ **

Is war the „way“ to the „quality“ you are speaking of?

Why I am saying that? Because of posts like the following ones:

Mr. Reasonable wrote:

„Buy cheap oil stocks and wait for the next war.“ **

Mr. Reasonable wrote:

„I can't wait for Hilary to win so we can have a real war that actually stimulates the economy. I'm so tired of hearing poor people bitch.“ **

 

==>

 

NACH OBEN

www.Hubert-Brune.de

 

 

WWW.HUBERT-BRUNE.DE

 

NACH OBEN