Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz |
<= [561][562][563][564][565][566][567][568][569][570] => |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1984 |
| 1985 |
„Fixed Cross once told me that i misread him and advised me to read The Birth of Tragedy. I downlowded and start reading it but many chapters passed i was still unable to understsand what his referred subject it, much less his opinion, thus stopped.
| 1986 |
| 1987 |
„Well, if you want to just use a single definition that is most compatible with me, »spirit« refers to physical motion or behavior and »concept« refers to those Platonic forms or essences that lack any physical volume.“ **
| 1988 |
„Like I said, the word »spirit« has become ambiguous, so let's just leave that word out and use either »energy« for the essence of any movement and »behavior« for any particular form or type of movement.
„Arminius wrote:
»Howsoever, do you agree with me that there are material and non-material forms of existence?« ** **
I can agree to that. RM:AO allows for a »physical realm of existence« (or »material«) and also a »conceptual realm of existence«. And understand that as the material existence reduces to zero, it approaches the conceptual realm. They share a border at »zero physical existence«.“ **
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1989 |
| „According
to Ernst Nolte there are especially the following »historical existentials«: | ||
| • | Religion (God/Gods, a.s.o); | |
| • | Rule (leadership, a.s.o.); | |
| • | Nobleness (nobility, a.s.o.); | |
| • | Classes; | |
| • | State; | |
| • | Great War; | |
| • | City and country as contrast; | |
| • | Education, especially in schools and universities; | |
| • | Science; | |
| • | Order of sexulality / demographics, economics; | |
| • | Historiography / awareness of history!“ ** ** | |
| Since
the beginning of the Western modern times: | ||
| 1. | Religion has been becoming a more secular religion, a modern religion, thus an ideology; so religion has been expanding. | |
| 2. | Rule (leadership, a.s.o.) has been becoming a more hidden, secret, esoteric one; so rule has been expanding. | |
| 3. | Nobleness (nobility, a.s.o.) has also been becoming a more hidden, secret, esoteric one; so nobleness has been expanding. | |
| 4. | Classes have been changing: a richer becoming upper class, a shrinking middle class, an increasing lower class; so classes have been changing badly. | |
| 5. | State has been becoming a more and more powerless institution; so the state has been shrinking, and probably it will disappear. ** ** | |
| 6. | Great war has been becoming smaller but much more wars and threatening; so we still can't say much about the end of this historical existential. | |
| 7. | City and country as contrast have been changing by expanding cities and shrinking countries; so the contrast will perhaps disappear. | |
| 8. | Education, especially in schools and universities, has been becoming a catastrophic issue; so education has been changing very badly. | |
| 9. | Science has been becoming a new religion for the most part; so science has been changing very badly. | |
| 10. | Order of sexulality / demographics, economics has been becoming a catastrophic issue too; so this order has been becoming a disorder. | |
| 11. | Historiography / awareness of history has been getting under ideological (modern religious) control; so historography has been changing badly!“ ** ** | |
| 1990 |
„Arminius wrote:
»And there are merely this two realms, because according to RM:AO ›absolutely zero‹ does not exist, so a zero realm does also not exist.« ** **
Yes, that border of »absolute zero« can never be breached. It is non-existence. Concepts have nothing to do with time or distance. For a concept to become a physical reality, it doesn't »cross the border«, but rather a physical potential (»situation«) must independently arise such as to form the concept within the physical realm. At that point the concept is a »physical state«.
Principles (»laws«) have that same issue because a principle is merely a special case of a concept. For a principle to physically exist, a situation must arise that constitutes a physical state to represent the principle otherwise the principle has no physical representation and remains independent of time and distance. A »political state« is an example.“ **
|
| 1991 |
|
| 1992 |
„Like I said, the word »spirit« has become ambiguous, so let's just leave that word out and use either »energy« for the essence of any movement and »behavior« for any particular form or type of movement.“ **
„Well, there you go using the »s« word again after we agreed not to. The conceptual realm and energy don't mix. Energy is of the physical realm.“ **
|
| 1993 |
|
| 1994 |
|
| 1995 |
| „Nous“: | „Vernunft“, „Geist“, „Denkkraft“, „Einsicht“. |
| „Vernunft“: | „reason“. |
| „Geist“: | „mind“, „conscience“, „consciousness“, „awareness“, „esprit“, „spirit“, „genie“, „intelligence“, „intellect“, „apprehension“, „brain“, „sense“, „genius“. |
| „Denkkraft“: | „think(ing) strength“. |
| „Einsicht“: | „insight“ „inspection“, „intelligence“. |
| „Verstand“: | „understanding“,, „intelligence“, „intellect“, „brains“. |
| „Intellekt“: | „intellect“. |
| „Idealität“: | „ideality“. |
| „Ideal(e)“: | „ideal(s)“. |
| „Idee“: | „idea“. |
| „Begriff“: | „concept“, „definition“, „term“, „idea“, „notion“, „conception“. |
| „Vorstellung“: | „imagination“, „representaion“, „idea“, „conception“. |
| „Konzept“: | „concept“, „conception“, „draft“, „draught“. |
| „Plan“: | „plan“, „map“, „programme“, „project“, „schedule“, „scheme“. |
|
| 1996 |
„Zinnat wrote:
»It is almost concluded now withih the scientific fraternity that the universe is expanding. And, its proof is the red shift observed by Hubble and its explanation is Doppler affect.
As far as the Doppler affect is concerned, it looks logical and can be used. But, i failed to understand how it proves that the red shift observed by the hubble is because of an expanding universe?« **
I can think of 4 reasons for red shift to occur. Only one of them requires an expanding universe.
1) Energy loss
2) Polarity segregation
3) Relative velocity (Doppler effect)
4) Shrinking universe1) Energy loss refers to the fact that a photon of light is not a fixed particle, but rather a clump or bunch of EMR noise and that clump gradually loses a little of its energy as it travels for 1000's of light years. In physics, it is presumed that the energy content and the wave length are a one-to-one correlation. So if they measure the energy content of a photon, they calculate the presumed »wavelength«. And if the photon has lost some of its energy content due to the extreme distance of travel, which it certainty will, they will deduce that the wavelength is lower than it was when it left the distance star. The physical length of the wave might not have changed at all, but they will deduce that it has = »presumed red shift«.
2) Polarity segregation refers to the fact that positive pulses of EMR and negative pulses do not experience the exact same delays from space while traveling through such great distances. A photon has both positive pulses within as well as negative, leaving it neutral in electric potential. If the space that the photon is traveling through has a greater delay upon the small positive pulses than the negative, the photon clump will elongate. That elongation is the segregating or slight filtering of the positive and negative EMR pulses within the photon. That elongation will constitute an actual increase in wavelength = "actual red shift".
3) Relative velocity refers to what is known as the Doppler effect that takes place any time a wave source is traveling away from a receiver. In such a case, the emitted light is transmitted with a longer wave length because each tiny portion of the clump leaves the moving source at a slightly different time. That results in a lower wave length being received by the receiver than what would have been received if the receiver had been moving with the light source. Such an effect constitutes an »apparent red shift«.
4) Shrinking universe refers to the fact that all sub-atomic particles are possibly slightly dissipating, yielding slight larger distances between objects as measured by the size of those particles. This effect has two consequences. Through time, it would appear as if the universe was expanding due to the distances between objects getting greater. But it would also have the effect of causing any wave being received to appear longer than it was when it left its source. The photons are also losing energy, but by a different rate. Thus the shrinking of the particles helps to compensate for the actually lower energy content that will be measured as higher by the smaller receiver. The combination of these yields a »perceived red shift«.
So I would say that answering only one out of four possible scenarios is hardly »proof« at all. A true proof requires the elimination of all alternatives. And in Science nothing is fact until it is "falsifiably demonstrated". They can at best falsify that the Doppler effect will yield a red shift. They cannot falsify that the appearance of red shift was caused by the velocity of the light source.
Their conclusion is merely a part of their extensive religiosity = what the want for you to believe they have »proven«.“ **
„But since WW2, Science was made into a religion. One is not allowed to question its dogma, so any experiment demonstrating otherwise will not be allowed and if revealed, will be altered so as to display the proper ordained theory.“ **
|
| 1997 |
„Phoneutria wrote:
»It involved wondering if you ever have a thought that isn't about a conspiracy to usurp global authority.« **
Can you name any significant thing that Man has done since the advent of the »word of God« that wasn't either an attempt to dominate the world or defend against someone else trying to dominate the world?
Today almost everything the USA does is all about »National Security« against the evil »terrorist« who seem to always be either Islamics or more often simply American citizens. And of course Islam is trying to defend against the evil Western imperialism as are those American citizens. And is founded by the Department of Homeland Security a legally required to be conspiracy (and paranoid extremists). Meanwhile Israel laughs all the way to the bank ... oh yeah, they ARE the bank founded by the conspiracy known as "usury" (lending out more money than you really had).
Did you really think that the USA gained its independence from England without conspiring to do so? Or that England wasn't conspiring to prevent it? Nations are not formed without conspiring to form them against anyone preferring not to.
Did you really think that the world wars came about by accidental happenstance?
Although there have been an uncountable number, this is a very shortened list of proposed »world empires« (not to mention at all the number that never succeeded):
British Empire
Qing Dynasty
Russian Empire
Mughal Empire
Japanese Empire
Northern Song Dynasty
Second French colonial empire
Mongol Empire
Ming Dynasty
Tang Dynasty
Southern Song Dynasty
Roman Empire
Spanish Empire
Mauryan Empire
German Colonial Empire
Earlier Zhao Dynasty
Umayyad Caliphate
Dutch Empire
Yuan Dynasty
Han Dynasty
Sui Dynasty
Austro-Hungarian Empire
Italian Empire
Achaemenid Empire, Iran
Western Jin Dynasty
Abbasid Caliphate
Rashidun Caliphate
Ottoman Empire
First French colonial empireIf you are not conquering the world, you are defending against the conquering of the world. Today they call themselves »Democratic Socialists«. Socialism itself cannot exist without conspiracy always at hand and under foot. Propaganda is inherently conspiratorial. What in your world hasn't been founded on and by conspiracy?
Even the original Science was merely an effort to escape the inherent conspiracy of cultism, only to later become its former enemy. The only innocents of conspiracy are those on the very bottom of society being the dupes conspired upon.
The hope for and of the world is to one day have a world without conspiracy. Of course a little not-conspiring would help.“ **
| (1) Powerful 1% | vs. | (2) Powerless 99% | |
| Main principle: | „divide et impera“ („divide and conquer“) | „obey or suffer“ | |
| Conspiracy: | yes | no or merely partly | |
| Conspiracy theories: | yes | no or merely partly | |
| Probability of success: | high (ca. 70-90%) | low (ca. 10-30%) | |
| Degree of disunity: | low | high | |
| Classes: | one (upper class) | one (lower class) or two (lower and middle class) | |
| Degree of wealth: | very rich | poor (lower class), mildly rich (middle class) |
|
| 1998 |
==> |
|
