01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 |
121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 |
<= [1511][1512][1513][1514][1515][1516][1517][1518][1519][1520] => |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8457 |
|
8458 |
I am not isolated in my group, but my group knows that it is isolated and does not want to isolate anyone. ** **
Isolated in this Webforum?
Do you think that you could be isolated in this webforum?
You could belong to one of these four groups:
I) An isolated group that does not know about its isolation and wants to drive others into isolation.
II) An isolated group that knows about its isolation and does not want to drive others into isolation.
III) An isolated group that knows about its isolation and wants to drive others into isolation.
IV) An isolated group that does not know about its isolation and does not want to drive others into isolation.Feel free to come out of the closet.
Please copy the following depiction, fill in your position within one of the four groups and post it.
Thank you. ** **
|
8459 |
|
8460 |
8461 |
|
8462 |
Kathrina wrote:
»Or a question! A good philosopher should be a good questioner.
One could proceed in such a way that opening posts that do not contain arguments or questions are moved to the non-philosophical chat subforum. In case of repetition, a warning or ban will be issued.« ** **
I agree, Kathrina.
One can't really do much wrong with a question in an opening post. Well, it has to be appropriate to the forum and the subforum where the thread with the question is to be opened, and it has to be serious, understandable and not offensive. ** **
|
8463 |
You have no shame, Otto ..., sneak in a quick advertisement .... **
I like it.
|
8464 |
|
8465 |
What is the difference between affectance and energy?
Don't they both mean - the ability to change something? **
To affect means to cause change. **
All of science is built upon ontologies. **
How do you do that with only »information« - information is the result of an ontology being physically tested for consistency. Information is a tool and dependent entirely on the ontology that was presumed when gathering that information. **
|
8466 |
Kultur wrote:
»States and nations are only not made to disappear completely, because they are very well suited as scapegoats. If this were not so, the real rulers of this world - the globalists (who rule privately!) - would have destroyed the states and nations long ago.
Already in 1990 the world order of Bretton Woods should have been overturned, because it was no longer up-to-date after the Cold War. Instead, the then U.S. President George. H. Bush spoke of a New World Order after the collapse of the Eastern bloc, but the Bretton Woods system is still there, albeit barely functional. By the Bretton Woods system I mean not only the economic part, but the whole order, including, for example, the geostrategic part.
I do not know whether the USA or/and the EU will break up or not. In Ancient Rome the civil war lasted for more than a century. It led to a synthesis: the principate of Augustus.« ** **
What is the Bretton Woods? **
|
8467 |
8468 |
==>
|