1601) Herr Schütze, 03.01.2022, 10:40; Kultur, 03.01.2022, 12:16 (8591-8592)

Frohes neues Jahr.

Die Propaganda macht sicherlich auch so etwas wie Demokratie zur Farce, ja, aber eine echte Demokratie hat es sowieso noch nie gegeben, und wenn sie zur Farce gemacht wird, bedeutet das nur, daß das „Spiel“ etwas offener „gestaltet“ wird, d.h. offener gezeigt wird, daß es nicht um Demokratie, sondern um Plutokratie geht. Um ein bekanntes Sprichwort ein wenig abzuwandeln: Die Demokratie denkt, die Plutokratie lenkt.

Das Volk (der „Demos“) ist noch nie an der Macht gewesen.

Sometimes I seriously wonder if this stupid „person“ (**) is a „she“ or a „transsexual“. Stupid enough he is anyway.

1602) Sleyor Wellhuxwell, 09.01.2022, 15:33 (8593)

There is much less to be said against and much more to be said for the replacement of all humans by machines.

1603) Hubert Brune, 17.01.2022 (8594)

Der gelöschte Rest Ihres Textes (**) zeugt nur wiederum von Ihrer Sprachunbegabtheit und - ebenfalls wiederum - von Ihrer Religion, über die Sie sich hier schon zu Genüge ausgelassen haben (mir reicht das allmählich!).

Warum drohen Sie mir schon wieder? Ich habe Ihnen schon oft genug gesagt, daß ich nicht Ihr Ersatz-Vater bin. Ich kann nichts dafür, daß mit Ihnen niemand etwas zu tun haben und keiner Ihr Ersatz-Vater sein will. Auch könnten Sie endlich einmal lernen, all das, was Sie selbst betrifft, nicht immer wieder nur auf Nietzsche und andere - d.h.: Nichtnietzsches - zu übertragen. Nietzsche suchte zeitlebens einen Ersatz-Vater, zunächst fand er ihn in Schopenhauer, dann in Wagner, und als seine geistige Krankheit dann völlig zum Ausbruch kam, mußte er doch wieder zurück zu Mama und Schwesterchen.

„Nietzsche wollte, daß der Mensch sich zu sich selbst ermutige, sich aufrichte. Heidegger sagt: Daraus ist nicht nur ein Aufrichten, sondern ein Aufstand geworden; ein Aufstand der Technik und der Massen, die nun durch die technische Beherrschung vollends zu den von Nietzsche so genannten »letzten Menschen« werden, die »blinzelnd« sich in ihren Behausungen und ihrem kleinen Glück einrichten und sich mit äußerlicher Brutalität gegen jede Beeinträchtigung ihrer Sicherheit und Besitzstände wehren. Der Mensch tritt in den Aufstand, sagt Heidegger ..., die Welt wird zum Gegenstand. .... Die Erde selbst kann sich nur noch als der Gegenstand des Angriffes zeigen .... Die Natur erscheint überall ... als der Gegenstand der Technik. Heidegger zufolge ist das alles schon bei Nietzsche angelegt, da bei ihm das Sein nur aus der Perspektive der ästhetischen, theoretischen, ethischen und praktischen Wertsetzung gesehen und deshalb verfehlt wird. Für den Willen zur Macht ist die Welt nur noch der Inbegriff von »Erhaltung-Steigerungsbedingungen«.  –  Doch kann, fragt Heidegger, das Sein höher geschätzt werden als so, daß es eigens zum Wert erhoben wird? Und er gibt die Antwort: Allein, indem das Sein als ein Wert gewürdigt wird, ist es schon zu einer vom Willen zur Macht selbst gesetzten Bedingung herabgesetzt, und damit sei jeder Weg zur Erfahrung des Seins selbst ausgelöscht.“ (Rüdiger Safranski, Ein Meister aus Deutschland - Heidegger und seine Zeit, 1994, S. 340 **).

Nietzsche konnte den Nihilismus nicht überwinden. Seine Metaphysik des Willens zur Macht in Verbindung mit der ewigen Wiederkehr des Gleichen, des Übermenschen, der Umwertung aller Werte usw. bleibt dem Nihilismus verhaftet. Es kann auch gar nicht anders sein.

Der Nietzscheanismus ist ein umgekehrter Platonismus und kann deshalb dem Platonimsus nur verhaftet bleiben. Die Religion, die Sie, Herr P., vertreten, heißt Nietzscheanismus fürs Volk, der ein umgekehrter Platonismus fürs Volk ist und deshalb dem Platonimsus fürs Volk nur verhaftet bleiben kann. Denn: Aus dem Platonismus ist ein Platonismus fürs Volk, aus dem Platonismus fürs Volk ein umgekehrter Platonismus und aus dem umgekehrten Platonismus ein umgekehrter Platonismus fürs Volk hervogegangen. Letzteren vertreten Sie. Sie stehen also mitten in einer Metaphysik fürs Volk - wenn auch umgekehrt: auf dem Kopf - und mitten in einer Religion fürs Volk, moderner gesagt: in einem biologistsichen Sozialismus fürs Volk.

Ihr Hinweis auf Ihre „Persönlichkeit“ ist überflüssig (außerdem - wie Sie vielleicht sehen können - gelöscht), denn Sie haben mir schon 2011 während unseres Emailkontaktes (alle Ihre Emails sind übrigens noch gespeichert) genug über Ihre persönliche Leidensgeschichte und darüber, daß sie deswegen in psychiatrischer Behandlung sind, mitgeteilt. Diese Leidensgeschichte und psychiatrische Behandlung sind offenbar Ihre einzige Ähnlichkeit mit Nietzsche.

Seine Minderwertigkeitskomplexe, seinen Selbsthaß hat Nietzsche auf andere übertragen. Spätestens ab 1880 war er geistig schon so verwirrt, daß es nur noch eine konsequente Folge war, daß sein Geist ab 1889 „so gut wie tot“ blieb.

Nietzsche ist dem Nihilismus verhaftet geblieben. Er hat den Nihilismus nicht überwunden. Immerhin hat er es versucht und dabei den Nihilismus noch mehr zur Vollendung gebracht als vor ihm schon Hegel, der diesbezüglich ebenfalls Beachtliches und ansonsten bei weitem mehr als Nietzsche geleistet hat.

Nietzsche hat den Nihilismus nicht überwunden, Nietzsche hat die Metaphysik nicht überwunden, Nietzsche hat den Platonismus nicht überwunden, Nietzsche hat Schopenhauer nicht überwunden, Nietzsche hat Wagner nicht überwunden, Nietzsche hat seine Minderwertigkeitskomplexe, seinen Selbsthaß nicht überwunden.

Daß Sie am Schluß Ihrer Heulerei auch noch Ihre Eifersucht auf Wangenheim zum Thema machen müssen, wundert mich überhaupt nicht, weil es ebenfalls davon zeugt, daß Sie einen Ersatz-Vater suchen, denn nun soll dieser Sie auch noch gegen Ihre „bösen“ Konkurrenten verteidigen, und wenn er das nicht tut, dann werden Sie mit Ihrem Trotzen weitermachen. Ich habe für Wangenheim nicht „viel mehr Verständnis“, wie Sie behaupten, sondern ihn sogar sehr kritisiert (**|**|**). Zum x-ten Male: Ich bin nicht Ihr Ersatz-Vater.

Übrigens: Das Schreiben von an mich gerichteten Emails können Sie sich sparen, denn sie werden alle - ungelesen - gelöscht werden, so wie auch die zuletzt von Ihnen mir geschickte Email - ungelesen - gelöscht worden ist.

Versuchen Sie doch erst einmal, jeden Augenblick so zu leben, daß Sie wünschen können, daß er Ihnen ohne Grauen wiederkehrt.

1604) Great Again, 20.01.2022, 18:50; 19:06; 21:39 (8595-8597)

I have read some thirty to forty Heidegger books and I cannot imagine that he would have said what you (**|**) quote him as saying.

Sorry.

Sleyor Wellhuxwell wrote:

„There is much less to be said against and much more to be said for the replacement of all humans by machines.“ ** **

Agreed.

What, if humans will become drones serving AI?

The most people (worldwide during the history so far) have been murdered by communists.

Communists say they are atheists.

1605) Kultur, 01.02.2022, 00:01 (8598)

Concerning Heidegger's Spengler-critiques, it is noticeable that in his first published Spengler-critique (1923) Heidegger hardly said anything negative, but rather neutral and positive about Spengler's main work, which for the most part still applies to his next two published Spengler-critiques (1929 and 1930), and that in his later published Spengler critiques (1936-’39, 1938/’39, 1942/’43), however, he seems to have reversed, indeed more than reversed, this relationship, namely to have said hardly anything positive, but something neutral and very much negative about Spengler's main work.

How did this change come about?

Well, Heidegger began in the mid-1930s to deal with Nietzsche more intensively than before - an argument that was to last until 1946 - and said publicly that most of what Spengler said in his main work came from Nietzsche, that basically in Spengler's main work Nietzsche's metaphysics of the will to power and the eternal recurrence of the same spoke and thus the completed but not overcome nihilism.

Nietzsche, contrary to his claims, his will, his wish, did not overcome nihilism - likewise, Nietzsche did not overcome metaphysics and was never able to separate himself from Schopenhauer and Wagner.

But if one interprets Spengler only as a Nietzschean, then one takes away from his main work about 70%, at any rate more than 50%. Spengler's main work goes back primarily to Goethe. The comparative method (cp e.g. analogy and homology) as the most important thing in Spengler's philosophy of history and culture goes back to that morphology as developed by Goethe.

Geschichte is not Historie. (Cp. my last four posts [**|**|**|**|**|**|**|**]). According to Heidegger, Historie is the technification of Geschichte, the technique of Geschichte, a part of the „Gestell“, the „Machenschaft“, the machination. Historie leads necessarily to Historismus - which makes everything even much worse. Occidental metaphysics (Heidegger also counts Greece as Occidental, the tradition did not, neither did Spengler) is nihilistic for Heidegger; it began with Plato and was brought to completion by Hegel and Nietzsche. Now, because Heidegger sees in Spengler only a Nietzschean and in Nietzsche the so far last of the two completers of occidental nihilism and thus also of metaphysics and subjectivism, he must interpret Spengler's main work also in this context. Occidental subjectivists imagine, secure, produce, order and so on very subjectively and thereby protect their inventory. The just mentioned „Gestell“ subordinates everything, and that at the expense of „Sein“ („being“) - one could also say: at the expense of nature.

If subjectivism is in its completion, then everyone can tell or write history according to his own (subjective) will, i.e. completely subjective, also extremely subjective, i.e. solipsistic - and it depends on his power whether his text is heard or seen (read). This has happened and happens more and more often, especially strongly accelerated since the beginning of the internet. No wonder that the monopolization of the media has increased more and more in the course of the last time. Today, one can say, the interpretation of history is dictated by the monopolized media - completely subjectively and completely in the sense of the just mentioned „Gestell“ (Technik, Machenschaft, machination).

What the „Gestell“ is doing is inevitably leading to the destruction of our planet. The planet can and will defend itself in its own way. At the latest when it does so, people will know again what „Sein“ means, including its relation to the „Dasein“ (human being - „das historische Tier“).

1606) Kultur, 02.02.2022, 00:01 (8599)

Satyr wrote:

„What I took from Spengler was his organic analysis of culture, connecting genes with memes in a logical continuum.“ **

Spengler’s organic analysis of culture goes back to Goethe’s developed morphology. Heidegger did not consider this in his Spengler critique, at least he did not mention it. Heidegger assumed very much the effects of Nietzsche on many contemporary thinkers (philosophers), poets and other artists, and these effects of Nietzsche were indeed enormous. (Just think not only of philosophy, but also of art, e.g. of Expressionism, Dadaism, Constructivism, Futurism, Surrealism and the like.) But with Spengler the influence of Nietzsche was more limited than with many other thinkers, poets and other artists of that time.

1607) Kultur, 20.02.2022, 17:48; Great Again, 20.02.2022, 18:59, 19:08, 21:08 (8600-8603)

HAPPY BIRTHDAY !

From ILP („Americanism“): ** **

„Carl Orff's Carmina Burana is one of the most popular pieces of the classical music repertoire. Here the UC Davis Symphony Orchestra, the University Chorus and Alumni Chorus, and the Pacific Boychoir perform at the Mondavi Center at UC Davis.“ **

- Carl Orff, Carmina Burana, 1937. **

You (**) have not provided a source anywhere. As long as the source is missing, every quote is merely an assertion - without any proof.

Sorry.

That's (**) what I thought.

Thank you.

1608) Kathrina, 01.03.2022, 19:18, 19:19, 19:29, 22:26 (8604-8607)

What kind of guy is Jimmy Dore?

It's true. Since the end of World War 2: if you are a Nazi, you support the Anti-Nazis, and if you are an Anti-Nazi, you support the Nazis.

1609) Alf, 29.03.2022, 15:19, 17:34, 18:40 (8608-8610)

The asset management companies such as Black Rock, Vanguard, State Street, Fidelity, Allianz and others on the one hand and the digital sector, which includes Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Facebook (recently: Meta) and others, on the other hand have merged with each other. You may call this fusion the digital-financial complex. The financial complex has uploaded its data to the digital complex, and the digital complex has its assets managed by the financial complex.

Which global players come into consideration for the globalist struggle? - On the side of tradition are mostly anti-traditional states or confederations of states; on the other side is the digital-financial complex. I have considered only the Western digital-financial complex in the accompanying figure. However, there is also an Eastern digital-financial complex that can rival the Western one, or at least could until recently. I am referring to the Chinese digital financial complex, which was recently put in check by the Chinese cenralist state to prevent power competition. The Chinese state has instead aligned itself with the Western digital-financial complex. Whether it will also disqualify it later, I don't know, but I think this measure is strategically very significant. What other alliance options does China have if it no longer needs to fear its own digital-financial complex? For example, it has relatively good relations with Russia (in the case of China, a lot has to be put into perspective, because China has a much stronger tendency toward isolation than any other global player today), with North Korea, with Iran, with Southeast Asian, African, South and Central American states, and, compared to the West, better relations with India and also with Islamic states. If one assumes this constellation, which one does not have to, then China is better off than the West, which has only itself and some of its offshoots. There are in this constellation about 3-4 billion people on or at the side of China and 1 billion people on or at the side of the West. But where does the Western digital-financial complex tend to stand in this matter? It is, after all, about as strong as the Western states in terms of assets. But the Western states, as mentioned above, are in complete dependence on the Western digital-financial complex. That can be changed. But how? Almost all key functions are occupied in such a way that, at least at present, there is no question of the Western states or confederations of states separating or even disempowering the Western digital-financial complex. In addition, there is the whole inner disunity in the West with its decadent people, who are constantly racially incited against each other and especially also by immigrants or their „lawyers“, the same applies to the enmities between the sexes as well as between the old and the young, between the right and the left, between the non-poor and the apparently poor, between the upper class, which at least apparently represents the lower class, and the middle class, ... etc. - everything staged, amplified to the extreme, in order to create as much chaos as possible (cf. the age-old motto: „Divide and rule!“), in order to once again steal the wealth of the middle class. **

Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates are not the most powerful players. Moreover, Bill Gates was apprenticed to Klaus Schwab, as were Vladimir Putin, Angela Merkel, Manuel Macron, and many, many others.

But how would you (**) interpret it if Putin is on the one hand the disciple of the Western globalist and technocratic transhumanist Klaus Schwab and on the other hand fights exactly against this globalism and technocratic transhumanism?

Noah Yuval Harari named three humanistic religions in some of his books (see, for example: A Brief History of Humankind, 2013; Sapiens, 2014 and 2020): (1.) liberalism; (2.) socialism; (3.) evolutionary humanism. Humanistic religions put the human being in the center and want to improve him. Most important for this are (1.) for liberalism the individual, (2.) for socialism the collective, (3.) for evolutionary humanism e.g. national socialism and transhumanism. (). This is what the homosexual Jew Noah Yuval Harari says. He is an advisor of Klaus Schwab. Of all things, a homosexual Jew advises Klaus Schwab, whose father was decorated by the National Socialists for National Socialist services and enjoyed National Socialist privileges. A coincidence? Hardly. National Socialism and transhumanism, then, are most important to evolutionary humanism, which is one of the three humanistic religions centering on man and seeking to improve him. The faith, the religion, the idea, the idealism, the ideology of the human change is always directed also to the state of the technology. So, the three humanistic religions are also directed according to the state of the art. From this follows that transhumanism as the newest variant of evolutionary humanism is directed after the state of the technology of its time. Now it is so that the digital offers itself almost in a perfect way to carry out a human manipulation, particularly since also the rest of the technology can guarantee that implants, chips, nanobots are not rejected by the human body. So transhumanism wants manipulated humans (those 99.99% of all humans), and as slaves. The offer of technology is just too tempting. Besides, the „if-I-don't-do-it, someone-else-does-it“-excuse helps.

Another Jew who also seems to be enthusiastic about the National Socialists is the Ukrainian President Volodomir Zelenskyy.

One often wonders whether there are any artists left at all.

„Creative destruction“ is what the „transhumanist“ Klaus Schwab, who founded the „World Economic Forum“ in 1971, calls the destruction of that which we Westerners have built up, but with it proportionately also that which the financial system dominating the world and thus also Klaus Schwab himself, who supports it, have built up. What is indicated in the systems of finance, economy, jurisdiction and politics is also indicated in art. "Creative destruction" therefore does not coincidentally go hand in hand with the art movement „de(con)structivism“. And as the latter tramples on art or what is left of it, so do those with money, trade, the business of medium-sized companies, laws, etc.. And - as I have already announced so often since April 2001 in the Internet: at the end about 0.0000001-0.001% humans are to remain as powerful ones, so to speak as „superhumans“, and consequently 999.999-99.99999% humans as slaves, so to speak as „subhumans“. As if all this would not be already cynical and misanthropic enough, Klaus Schwab calls this goal also still completely openly „transhumanism“. He seems to be sure of his cause, even believes that this madness will be realized already in 2030. Schwab not only wants to expropriate us, i.e. not only to abolish our property, but even to abolish our possessions, i.e. to abolish us, because he who cannot possess cannot exist. Property is legally secured, but possession is not, because possession is only given purely factually, and existentially. **

Topic: Is the Russian-Ukrainian War the prelude to a new World War?

Is the Russian-Ukrainian War the prelude to a new World War?

- Was there really a Russian invasion of Ukraine?
- Hasn't this Russian-Ukrainian war been going on since 2014?
- Can this war expand into a world war (e.g. by Poland interfering in this war and, because Poland is a member of NATO, thereby triggering the world war)?

It is funny that the West always knows in advance who is the good guy and who is the bad guy.

The West (i.e. mainly: USA!) has never cared about what would become of the people it bombed to death to the last inhabitant.

A mentally ill person.

1610) Otto, 30.03.2022, 01:09, 01:10, 18:40 (8611-8613)

Kathrina wrote:

„

“ ** **

Kathrina wrote:

„

“ ** **

==>