WWW.HUBERT-BRUNE.DE
Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz  Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz  Kommentare zu Kommentaren im Weltnetz
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160

<= [1571][1572][1573][1574][1575][1576][1577][1578][1579][1580] =>

Jahr  S. E. 
 2001 *  1
 2002 *  1
 2003 *  1
 2004 *  3
 2005 *  2
 2006 *  2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 0  
2010 56
2011 80
2012 150
2013 80
2014 230
2015 239
2016 141
2017 160
2018 30
2019 18
2020 202
 
S.
1
2
3
6
8
10
12
14
14
70
150
300
380
610
849
990
1150
1180
1198
1400
 
P. Z.
 
100%
50%
100%
33,33%
25%
20%
16,67%
 
400%
114,29%
100%
26,67%
60,53%
39,18%
16,61%
16,16%
2,61%
1,53%
16,86%
 
S.E. (S.)
T. (S.)
0,0039
0,0032
0,0030
0,0044
0,0047
0,0048
0,0049
0,0050
0,0044
0,0198
0,0384
0,0702
0,0819
0,1219
0,1581
0,1726
0,1885
0,1813
0,1754
0,1946
 
K.  
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
4
0  
158
97
246
169
1614
1579
1950
1102
79
26
671
 
S.
1
2
3
6
8
10
12
16
16
174
271
517
686
2300
3879
5829
6931
7010
7036
7707
 
P. Z.
 
100%
50%
100%
33,33%
25%
20%
33,33%
 
987,50%
55,75%
90,77%
32,69%
235,28%
68,65%
50,27%
18,91%
1,14%
0,37%
9,54%
 
  K.  
S. E.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
2,82
1,21
1,64
2,11
7,02
6,61
13,83
6,89
2,63
1,44
3,32
 
  K.  
T.
0,0039
0,0027
0,0027
0,0082
0,0055
0,0055
0,0055
0,0109
0
0,4328
0,2658
0,6721
0,4630
4,4219
4,3260
5,3279
3,0192
0,2164
0,0712
1,8333
 
 K. (S.) 
S.E. (S.)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,143
1,143
2,486
1,807
1,723
1,805
3,770
4,569
5,888
6,027
5,941
5,873
5,505
 
K. (S.)
T. (S.)
0,0039
0,0032
0,0030
0,0044
0,0047
0,0048
0,0049
0,0057
0,0050
0,0491
0,0693
0,1210
0,1479
0,4596
0,7225
1,0164
1,1362
1,0843
1,0302
1,0710
* Von 2001 bis 2006 nur Gästebuch, erst ab 2007 auch Webforen und Weblogs.

NACH OBEN 1571) Sleyor Wellhuxwell, 11.08.2021, 22:01 (8440)

8440

Meno wrote:

„Is covid a bio-weapon or could it have been intended?“ **

First of all, bio-weapons have always been intended, otherwise they would never have been bio-weapons. There are no bioweapons without intention.

Meno wrote:

„This is a poll to seek opinions on a subject that has been gone for a while, partly suppressed and partly conveniently forgotten, perhaps

So the choices are:

1) Yes, it is a purposefully developed and used bio-weapon.

2) Yes, it is a developed bio-weapon but accidentally released by a disgruntled super conservative employee or politically disenchanted underboss.

3) No, it was merely coincidental that a pure research facility had gone through an accident.

4) No, because there was no relationship between the lab and vampires.

5) It was Russia's and Putin's involevement that an x KGB man instigated , surepetitiously slipping into the Chinese biological laboratory

6) The facts can not corralate an impression one way or another.“ **

„Covid 19“ is a purposefully developed and used bio-weapon (=> 1). It is the start into the transhumanistic dicatorship, as many of the globalists have already admitted.

It is hell. Evil has never been so much in the world and so much around every human being as it is today.

Most people will again be unaware of this and just go along with this hell trip and blame the rest of humanity for it. In the end, only machines and maybe machine people will be left. But pure, real human beings will no longer exist.

 

NACH OBEN 1572) Kathrina, 12.08.2021, 01:29 (8441)

8441

Not only (**).

 

NACH OBEN 1573) Alf, 13.08.2021, 23:03 (8442)

8442

Where can this church (**) be found? In England?

 

NACH OBEN 1574) Kultur, 14.08.2021, 01:31 (8443)

8443

Albrecht Dürer:
Selbstbildnis
, 1500.

Albrecht Dürer, Selbstbildnis, 1500

 

NACH OBEN 1575) Kultur, 15.08.2021, 23:21 (8444)

8444

Albrecht Dürer’s Monogram:

Albrecht Dürers Monogramm

Albrecht Dürer, Zeichner des liegenden Weibes.

Albrecht Dürer, „Zeichner des liegenden Weibes“

 

NACH OBEN 1576) Kultur, 16.08.2021, 01:05 (8445)

8445

Johann Ettling:
Arthur Schopenhauer mit seinem Lieblingshund Atman (Holzschnitt).

Arthur Schopenhauer mit seinem Lieblingshund Atman

 

NACH OBEN 1577) Great Again, 17.08.2021, 23:40 (8446)

8446

Wendy Darling wrote:

„Should cosmetic surgery and treatments be paid for by medicare/medicaid? For example, bald men get free cutting edge hair replacements or women get facelifts to feel better?“ **

The question is not easy to answer. But I would say that cosmetic surgery and treatments paid for by medicare/medicaid reinforce the already existing (and especially in English-speaking countries) differences between the different classes of health insurance.

People „at the bottom“ keep their insecurities by believing they are no longer beautiful enough, people „at the top“ get new insecurities by believing they are no longer beautiful enough.

The owners of the private health insurance companies will be happy about this, but the taxpayers for the state health insurance companies will not.

 

NACH OBEN 1578) Otto, 18.08.2021, 01:11 (8447)

8447

Chakra Superstar wrote:

„All Saints Church in Hereford, England, from what I read.

The church was built in the 1300's but the carving was only noticed when an additional floor was added (for a restaurant, I think) and this was discovered that during the restoration. I wonder if it supposed to tell us something about the church's priest?... or perhaps the sculptor was saying he was fucked over by the church?... or he might have tripped -- almost falling to his death -- and saw this I'm-fucked-image flash past him? Believing it was a message from God, he felt compelled to carve it?“ **

Maybe - but really just maybe - the one you call „the church's priest“wanted it that way himself (?).

 

NACH OBEN 1579) Great Again, 24.08.2021, 21:18 (8448)

8448

An existential-philosophical (Heideggerian) statement follows:

Existence means „being held in the world“. Those who are held in the world are those who know that they are in the world. Only human beings, more precisely: only those human beings who know that they are in the world are in the world, do exist. Existence is „being-in-the-world“.

 

NACH OBEN 1580) Great Again, 27.08.2021, 01:01 (8449)

8449

Martin Heidegger
Martin Heidegger
Wendy Darling wrote:

„What I think the Greek philosophers got right was using simple observations to guide their assertions.“ **

Interestingly, this is what Heidegger also said - like you () - only he meant above all the Presocratic philosophers, because the ontological (= metaphysical = philosophical) obscurations already began after them, but especially since Christianity (Platonism for the people). Keywords: „forgetfulness of being“ and „abandonment of being“.

To avoid confusion, Heidegger distinguished between „existentia“ and „existence“. „Existentia“ means ontologically as much as „presence of everything non-human“. It is difficult to translate Heidegger's terminology into English, because there are no really appropriate English translations for most of the words he used as ontological (metaphysical, i.e.: philosophical) terms.

Heidegger was concerned with the most philosophical subject of all: being. Philosophy is metaphysics, ontology. But in order to be able to discover or recognise being, (1) the history of the philosophy of the forgetfulness of being - i.e. from Plato to Nietzsche - must be recapitulated, or (2) the traces of a more primal experience of being and truth (e.g. through the so called „Lanthanotes“ like the said Presocratics or poets such as Hölderlin and Rilke) must be pursued. These two ways are called „the first beginning“ and „the other beginning“.

Wendy Darling wrote:

„Now it seems the wheels of philosophical progress endlessly spin in place, our imaginations running wild in order to avoid simple truth.“ **

Heidegger would have subscribed to this of your statements too (), except that he would have said more precisely that it is primarily the modern sciences and especially the modern technology, to which the sciences have completely surrendered, that are to blame. This is even one of the main results of Heidegger's researches. As a philosopher, Heidegger was not only fundamentally ontologically, but also and especially ecologically oriented. Seen in this light, he was an ecosophist.


Have a nice Friday, Wendy.

 

==>

 

NACH OBEN

www.Hubert-Brune.de

 

 

WWW.HUBERT-BRUNE.DE

 

NACH OBEN