1571) Sleyor Wellhuxwell, 11.08.2021, 22:01 (8539)

Meno wrote:

„Is covid a bio-weapon or could it have been intended?“ **

First of all, bio-weapons have always been intended, otherwise they would never have been bio-weapons. There are no bioweapons without intention.

Meno wrote:

„This is a poll to seek opinions on a subject that has been gone for a while, partly suppressed and partly conveniently forgotten, perhaps

So the choices are:

1) Yes, it is a purposefully developed and used bio-weapon.

2) Yes, it is a developed bio-weapon but accidentally released by a disgruntled super conservative employee or politically disenchanted underboss.

3) No, it was merely coincidental that a pure research facility had gone through an accident.

4) No, because there was no relationship between the lab and vampires.

5) It was Russia's and Putin's involevement that an x KGB man instigated , surepetitiously slipping into the Chinese biological laboratory

6) The facts can not corralate an impression one way or another.“ **

„Covid-19“ is a purposefully developed and used bio-weapon (=> 1). It is the start into the transhumanistic dicatorship, as many of the globalists have already admitted.

It is hell. Evil has never been so much in the world and so much around every human being as it is today.

Most people will again be unaware of this and just go along with this hell trip and blame the rest of humanity for it. In the end, only machines and maybe machine people will be left. But pure, real human beings will no longer exist.

1572) Kathrina, 12.08.2021, 01:29 (8540)

Not only (**).

1573) Alf, 13.08.2021, 23:03 (8541)

Where can this church (**) be found? In England?

1574) Kultur, 14.08.2021, 01:31 (8542)

Albrecht Dürer:
Selbstbildnis, 1500.

1575) Kultur, 15.08.2021, 23:21 (8543)

Albrecht Dürer’s Monogram:

Albrecht Dürer, Zeichner des liegenden Weibes.

1576) Kultur, 16.08.2021, 01:05 (8544)

Johann Ettling:
Arthur Schopenhauer mit seinem Lieblingshund Atman (Holzschnitt).

1577) Great Again, 17.08.2021, 23:40 (8545)

Wendy Darling wrote:

„Should cosmetic surgery and treatments be paid for by medicare/medicaid? For example, bald men get free cutting edge hair replacements or women get facelifts to feel better?“ **

The question is not easy to answer. But I would say that cosmetic surgery and treatments paid for by medicare/medicaid reinforce the already existing (and especially in English-speaking countries) differences between the different classes of health insurance.

People „at the bottom“ keep their insecurities by believing they are no longer beautiful enough, people „at the top“ get new insecurities by believing they are no longer beautiful enough.

The owners of the private health insurance companies will be happy about this, but the taxpayers for the state health insurance companies will not.

1578) Otto, 18.08.2021, 01:11 (8546)

Chakra Superstar wrote:

„All Saints Church in Hereford, England, from what I read.

The church was built in the 1300's but the carving was only noticed when an additional floor was added (for a restaurant, I think) and this was discovered that during the restoration. I wonder if it supposed to tell us something about the church's priest?... or perhaps the sculptor was saying he was fucked over by the church?... or he might have tripped -- almost falling to his death -- and saw this I'm-fucked-image flash past him? Believing it was a message from God, he felt compelled to carve it?“ **

Maybe - but really just maybe - the one you call „the church's priest“wanted it that way himself (?).

1579) Great Again, 24.08.2021, 21:18 (8547)

An existential-philosophical (Heideggerian) statement follows:

Existence means „being held in the world“. Those who are held in the world are those who know that they are in the world. Only human beings, more precisely: only those human beings who know that they are in the world are in the world, do exist. Existence is „being-in-the-world“.

1580) Great Again, 27.08.2021, 01:01 (8548)

Wendy Darling wrote:

„What I think the Greek philosophers got right was using simple observations to guide their assertions.“ **

Interestingly, this is what Heidegger also said - like you () - only he meant above all the Presocratic philosophers, because the ontological (= metaphysical = philosophical) obscurations already began after them, but especially since Christianity (Platonism for the people). Keywords: „forgetfulness of being“ and „abandonment of being“.

To avoid confusion, Heidegger distinguished between „existentia“ and „existence“. „Existentia“ means ontologically as much as „presence of everything non-human“. It is difficult to translate Heidegger's terminology into English, because there are no really appropriate English translations for most of the words he used as ontological (metaphysical, i.e.: philosophical) terms.

Heidegger was concerned with the most philosophical subject of all: being. Philosophy is metaphysics, ontology. But in order to be able to discover or recognise being, (1) the history of the philosophy of the forgetfulness of being - i.e. from Plato to Nietzsche - must be recapitulated, or (2) the traces of a more primal experience of being and truth (e.g. through the so called „Lanthanotes“ like the said Presocratics or poets such as Hölderlin and Rilke) must be pursued. These two ways are called „the first beginning“ and „the other beginning“.

Wendy Darling wrote:

„Now it seems the wheels of philosophical progress endlessly spin in place, our imaginations running wild in order to avoid simple truth.“ **

Heidegger would have subscribed to this of your statements too (), except that he would have said more precisely that it is primarily the modern sciences and especially the modern technology, to which the sciences have completely surrendered, that are to blame. This is even one of the main results of Heidegger's researches. As a philosopher, Heidegger was not only fundamentally ontologically, but also and especially ecologically oriented. Seen in this light, he was an ecosophist.

Have a nice Friday, Wendy.

==>