1611) Alf, 01.04.2022, 01:37, 14:41, 14:54, 14:57, 15:20, 17:24, 19:08, 20:14, 23:59, 23:59, (8613-8622)
The United States, for example, makes sure that in Old-Europe everyone is ashamed as soon as he loves his country or - even worse - his people. In the United States itself, however, the country and the people should continue to be loved or just left. If one said in Old-Europe to leave Old-Europe, who does not love it, one would be exposed to the left-wing agitation directed by the USA: right extremism, fight against the right-wing, Nazi and so on. That behind this there is nothing else than a geostrategy to keep the Old-Europeans down, so that the US-Americans can be free in everything they do, is only unclear to such people who cannot even reach IQ 10.
The US-Americans are so arrogant, must be so arrogant, because otherwise they will lose their position of world power. But they will lose it anyway - either in the short term or in the medium to long term. They don't want to give up power, of course - they'd rather bomb away the rest of all human beings or kill them in some other way.
So, with regard to the Russian-Ukrainian war, one can be on one side or the other from the outset. This question, on which side one stands, is quite also a philosophical one, i.e. also and perhaps even particularly an ethical one. A democrat can never love a world power, in fact not even tolerate it. This is also true for any other representative of a form of rule, e.g. for an aristocrat or a monarch. It just does not apply to the one who has the world power. And because everyone who has the world power does not want to give it away but has to expand it in order to be able to keep it, others who have the possibility will want to oust the respective world power ruler. This has happened constantly in the history of mankind.
This Russian-Ukrainian war, which is a proxy war, is not about the question whether the USA or Russia will win it, but whether the geostrategy of the USA or the geostrategy of Russia will be successful and lead to the fact that China will replace the USA as a world power either quite soon or only later.
If one wants to judge the matter neutrally, then one must first remove the propaganda carried out by the media of the USA, by which above all Old-Europe is affected, because it is to be kept down. If this propaganda would be removed, the USA would immediately have Old-Europe as an enemy, because then most Old-Europeans would know how much they have been oppressed by the USA since 1945.
So - from the point of view of the USA - this propaganda of the media of the USA must be continued, even enormously strengthened, in order to be able to achieve the same result for Old-Europe in the future as from 1945 until today.
The Chinese are planning a new Silk Road, partly it is already built. Their intention is to dominate the whole of Eurasia and also Africa. Their propaganda in this regard is already underway.
If China will replace the USA as a world power, America would be only an island far away from Eurasia - at least from the point of view of the Old-Europeans and the rest of Europeans (Russians not included). This is what the U.S. is most afraid of: an alliance between Germany and Russia would then be possible again - as before 1914 - which England and the U.S. have tried again and again to prevent - since 1914 with success. ** **
Again: That behind this there is nothing else than a geostrategy to keep the Old-Europeans down, so that the US-Americans can be free in everything they do, is only unclear to such people who cannot even reach IQ 10. (See: ** **). An example: If Trump is IQ 45, then Peter Kropotkin is IQ 3.
It's not my fault if you don't understand this.
Try to read these books (before you open your mouth too wide next time):
@ Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3).
You are always insultuing people, for example Trump and many ILP members.
Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) loves the USA? Okay, thus: Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) is a nazi!
Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) supports Ukrainian nazis? Okay, thus: Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) is a nazi!
It's just funny and very typical that Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) as a right-winger (nazi) always accuses others of being right-wingers (nazis).
The quiz is a test.
Now the most important two questions on this subject of suffering::
1.) Who will suffer the most from the sanctions as a result?
1612) Alf, 02.04.2022, 00:12; Sleyor Wellhuxwell, 02.04.2022, 01:03; Alf, 02.04.2022, 14:45, 14:46, 15:00, 17:18, 17:57 (8623-8629)
It is useless to talk to you (**). You are really too stupid - just IQ 3 or even less!
I don't feel like wasting my time on such a stupid person.
Yes, it is. This world war can be prevented, but that it will happen is less likely than the reverse.
Nation against nation, ethnic group against ethnic group, right against left, non-whites against whites, Muslims against Christians, women against men, young against old, foreigners against nationals, vaccinated against unvaccinated, Putin-understanders against Ukraine-Nazi-supporters, climate lie against the truth, liars and corrupt (conspirators) against the truth enlighteners like real historians (recently branded as conspiracy theorists). All are to be brought by means of fear that they agree to the largest dictatorship of the world history or, if they do not do that, are killed, if they are not already dead by vaccination, war and every kind of chaos anyway.
The following graphic shows roughly how the balance of power is distributed.
It is easy to find out who has the most to say. Money has always been the most powerful. Since the 1970s, however, the digital complex has been added, and since the 1990s, partly due to the internet, it has become as powerful as Black Rock, the most powerful asset management of the financial complex. Politics has always been bought and therefore susceptible to blackmail.
Now, moreover, at least 99% of all people are losing their self-determination because they have to leave all their money and all their data to the globalist rulers.
Operation Overlord - one of many examples:
German rocket scientists (aerospace engineers): Wernher von Braun and his team at Fort Bliss, Texas, USA, 1945. Abducted and blackmailed (many of them were in the NSDAP and SS, e.g. also Wernher von Braun).
I hope that people will rebel. But the globalists go relatively slowly, so slowly that people don't notice the fraud (although people like Peter Kropotkin and many others would never notice the fraud anyway). At some point the bag will be closed. Then it is too late for a rebellion (see: Kropotkin again - but this time the real, the historical one: Pyotr Kropotkin - and other communists who did not notice how the others, the more intelligent totalitarians, took them by surprise).
Truth dies first. Hope dies last.
We must enlighten the masses!
1613) Great Again, 24.04.2022, 01:28; Kultur, 24.04.2022, 17:30, 18:04; Great Again, 24.04.2022, 20:28, 23:43 (8630-8634)
However, the so-called Boomer Generation is now far beyond the median age, so has been part of the older half of the population for a long time, and this means that they also react strongly to attacks on health, and since Covid 19 relies on fear to exploit the middle class (carrier of all achievement!) more than ever before (think of the consequences due to the lockdowns: many companies are broke!).
Nevertheless, I do not only want to excuse the Boomer Generation. But taking into account the factors of age and fear is important. Isn't it?
The side effects and consequential damages caused by the vaccination against Covid 19 are enormous.
The example Mags (**) gave is not an isolated case. There are many such cases.
It seems to be a ping-pong game between fear-mongering and seriousness-mongering. In any case, there are stalling tactics at play. They need time for certain agenda goals, such as the conversion from cash to digital central bank money, which is still in the testing phase and can and will only be offered after the big chaos anyway, because people won't just accept it, but during the big chaos they will perceive it as liberation from the big chaos.
At first, money defeats politics and the economy (today understood as the real economy). But it is defeated by blood at the end of the cultural cycle. This happens in the time of the fighting states, the time between Napoleonism and Caesarism, in which - as said - first the money wins, but at the end the blood, so that the first becomes the second Caesarism, i.e. from primal Caesarism becomes Caesarist monarchy (Augustus called it principate, but it was what we know from history as the Roman Empire, which, by the way, underwent a new edition after the fall of Rome: Frankish Empire, Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation - from Caesar [Latin] to Kaiser [German]).
Eugenics has never gone away since its beginning, it has only hidden itself sometimes more, sometimes less. Today it hides again a little less, i.e. it appears a little more emphasized than in the last decades. But it has never been gone or even defeated. Eugenics is a huge business. For that reason alone, it will not be abandoned. On the contrary, it will continue to gain influence, whether hidden or unhidden.
Eugenics has primarily connected with the digital complex, or conversely, the digital complex has put a lot of money into eugenics. This is really new, because the digital complex has not been around long. The first computer was built by Konrad Zuse in 1941. The era of digitalization means the networking of computers into networks up to the internet, so it began in the 1960s.
Yes. But others too, for example the digital complex (includinig all its organisations and foundations), the financial complex (includinig all its organisations and foundations), the energy complex, the food complex, the political complex (including the military complex and the secret services), the science complex and - last but not least - the media complex. They and the pharmaceutical complex belong together as one criminal complex.
The slogan NEVER AGAIN is only a rhetorical slogan in order to get more power. It has NEVER had anything to do with the subject itself.
Globalists currrently prefer liberal-leftists for their goals. Both are the current actors of totalitarianism. Their script was published by Klaus Schwab in 2020 (written before 2020): The Great Reset.
History repeats somehow anyway.
Did he (**) actually go to school once?
He (**) is still on the preschool level.
1614) Great Again, 27.04.2022, 01:18, 01:37, 02:08, 19:10, 19:38, 20:14; 20:40; 20:59; 21:35; 23:28 (8635-8634)
The following text is about probabilities.
We are still in autumn, but already not far away from winter.
Let us take two guys and call one S., because he is sixty or seventy years old, and the other T., because he is twenty or thirty years old.
It is very likely that T. makes the shaping of the future more dependent on politics than on economics, especially finance, and accordingly favors certain political parties; earlier, e.g., in the 19th century and for the most part also in the first half of the 20th century, these tended to be parties that we would today call right-wing parties; in the 20th century this is gradually reversed, so that from the second half onward it is more likely to be parties that we are used to calling left-wing parties.
In the case of S., however, it is rather the other way around. He rather lets the economy, especially the financial economy, shape the future, so that for him the political parties play almost no role, because they are bought by the money powers. Money cares about parties only when they can be bought, otherwise it doesn't care about them - they can do what they want: the main thing is that the cash register rings.
With age one becomes wiser, but nevertheless it is also, even if not so often, the case that T. can also already know what S. knows, and S. still does not know what T. already knows. Well, you know: it is the probability that confirms my above statement.
And there is also an argument from the more objective side that proves both S. and T. right. For the facts known to us from history also confirm that in certain times politics dominates money and in other, again certain times money dominates politics.
But what is really the case today?
I say that we are currently witnessing how money, having already dominated politics for a relatively long time, is now in its last gasps. That is why it is fighting back, at all levels, in all areas, because it has bought them all. That is why politics now has the opportunity to dominate money again - as it did before - for a long time.
Even then, if no suitable person should be found in politics for this, money would have to give up its dominance. The money people would then have to transform themselves into politicians. However it will come: money as a dominant power is about to come to an end.
Since the 1960s, however, there has been a problem that never existed before in history: the digitality of data. This is truly a novelty in history. Or have archaeologists or historians of prehistory found ancient computers that were networked together? No!
So S. is right about the current situation with the money dying off, and T., however, is right about all times before and after the rule of the money. The question is only whether S. and T. know these historical facts, their statements thus this connection contain or not - if not, then merely S. would be right, but only concerning the history of the last approximately 2 centuries as well as the present and some years of the future.
If higher living beings are in a tight corner, they lash out more and more. Staged assaults, wars (also world wars), crashs, mass migrations, total crashs, Covid-19 and many other signs show that the current rulers of this planet - the globalists - are in a tight corner. This signs are no signs of strength and also no signs of harmlessness, they are signs of weakness and also signs of danger.
We are currently in the historical phase where weak men create hard times, but already not far from the next historical phase where hard times create strong men.
Climatical Cycle and Historical Cycle:
We are still in autumn, but already not far away from winter.
There are several errors in these statements.
1.) It is a historically proven fact that nations have often been provoked until they had no other recourse but to strike back. To then call this "invasion" shows a lack of knowledge of history and a lack of knowledge of human nature.
2.) The global international security ordercreated after World War II, of which Milley speaks, is after all that of the so-called Cold War, i.e., the most horrific of the stellar wars (preferably on territories outside the Western bloc and the Eastern bloc).
3.) A so-called international order can therefore not perish at all. Because Milley means the so-called global international security order of the so-called Cold War (see: 2.)), and this was now guaranteed no order, but a disorder, namely the very disorderly proxy wars - mostly in the Third World.
These three mistakes are serious mistakes, but of course the brainwashed don't notice them, and Milley's whole argumentation is based on these mistakes, so it is propaganda, and since Milley knows or at least can know these mistakes, it is a lying propaganda: he says wrong things on purpose.
I am not saying this because I am pro-Russia. True, I am not in favor of Ukraine either. But I am for justice. And it is a fact that NATO has been militarily supporting Ukraine's provocations since 2004, or at the latest since 2014, in order to force Russia to go to war, in order to be able to change the government, from which the United States can then - once again - profit.
The Digital-Financial Complex of the West (mentioned by Alf) is the ruler of the world to which all other global players must listen, including the Military Complex of the West. The states of the West are no longer sovereign. In the East it is different.
Putin has done a lot in the first years since the beginning of his presidency in 2000 to be able to do business with the West. The West has arrogantly rejected Putin - there was one exception: the German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder; but he has also had to pay dearly for this: Vote of no confidence and subsequent loss of his chancellorship, because no other party wanted to form a coalition with the SPD anymore (good job, secret service!). Behind all this is the geostrategy that has been existing since the 19th century: Preventing an alliance between Germany and Russia at any price (that's why Nord Stream 2 has been abandoned now).
After it became clear to Putin that he would not be able to do anything with Europe - i.e.: Germany - he turned to China. Does Milley, does Biden or anyone else in the USA seriously believe that the sanctions will hit Russia or China so hard that they will capitulate? Europe has to pay the whole bill once again!
Benelux means: Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg. These three countries were and are militarily NOT neutral.
Switzerland is still militarily neutral. Or have you heard anything about Switzerland joining NATO? I hope not, because that would really be a case of war!
Probably you meant Sweden and Finland. Don't you? But even these two are FORCED to give up their military neutrality. This happens NOT FREELY.
Putin is too weak to save us.
Great Again wrote:
Russia no longer has any choice but to submit to China.
Who is to blame when one side constantly provokes in order to finally have the war, so that a regime change can once again be made in enemy territory: the provoked or the provoker?
If Im asking you (**) this, its not because youre an U.S. citizen, but because youre posting in a forum thats supposed to be about philosophy.
Have a nice day, by the way.
Ultimately, Russia must and will submit to China both militarily (in modern terms, politically) and economically. Actually, it has already done so. What else should it do? The West does not want it, and since Western and Central Europe, also belong to the West, I can only say that it is a huge mistake to leave Russia to the Chinese and to give up doing business with Russia.
A walk between the columns to a black hole.
It is completely intentional to discriminate against Whites, to hostile them, to wage war against them, to oppress them, to make them disappear. And this intention comes not only from non-whites. It also comes from whites. Anti-whiteism (anti-Europeanism) is growing more and more everywhere. In the meantime, none of the anti-whites is afraid to make this known openly and loudly.
One should always ask oneself: Whom does this serve? (Cui bono?) And one should not forget in the investigation to ask also about the way, which the money takes thereby: Follow the money, in order to find out, who it is, whom all this serves. Take into account also that digitalization is a technique - a white one, of course ! - which, after having stored all our data, is supposed to turn us into beings in which the digital data and the biology are fused, and in case of resistance of these beings, to simply turn them off with a click.
We have a responsibility, first of all to ourselves. What is true in the individual must also be true in the community. So we have to live up to our responsibility and protect ourselves and our descendants - just as the non-whites do it with great naturalness, but want to forbid us to do it as well.
And do not forget: It was only we Whites who made all technical, economic and other achievements possible at all for the White-haters (racists!). All non-whites would still be living in completely pre-modern times today if it hadn't been for us whites. And exactly this is probably the main reason for the white hatred, the racism against whites, the anti-whiteism.
Es freut mich, eine Person (**) aus meinem Heimatland hier begrüßen zu dürfen. Herzlich willkommen!
- Haindling (H.-J. Buchner, H.-J. Braun, M. Braun, P. Enderlein, R. Kürvers, R. Raschner), Du Depp, 1983. -
Klaus Schwab is the one who expands the power of the globalists with his knowledge of technology and economics and trains helpers, i.e. leaders and shapers, for this purpose, among other things, in his World Economic Forum. This Klaus Schwab has said once that Putin was his favorite pupil, and Putin has lost praising words also about Klaus Schwab. Now both of them are keeping a low profile with such statements.
In any case, the Ukrainian-Russian war, like almost every war in history, is staged. Don't you believe it? It is very suitable for interrupting supply chains, similar to the lockdown in Shanghai and Shenzhen or even in Hamburg: the ships for export simply do not sail anymore and in this way ensure the absence of certain raw materials and products, i.e. for enormous price increases and in more and more countries for an enormous increase in starvation deaths.
Die plutokratische Transformation (1913-2030) - dieser von Effenberger gewählte Titel für seinen Gastbeitrag ist bestens gewählt, wissen die meisten Menschen doch gar nicht, daß diese plutokratische Transformation tatsächlich 1913 (am 23.12.) begann, obwohl schon lange vorher geplant gewesen, und nach dem Willen dieser Plutokraten 2030 enden soll - übrigens auch nach dem Willen der Digitalherrscher, die es vor der Digitalisierung der Welt noch gar nicht gab. Die Digitalherrscher bilden mit den Geldherrschern ein Duumvirat. Da der Denkherrscher Klaus Schwab mit seiner Denkfabrik ebenfalls eingebunden ist, kann man auch von einem Triumvirat sprechen.
Und: Wie ich schon in meiner Neujahrsansprache gesagt habe:
Die Propaganda macht sicherlich auch so etwas wie Demokratie zur
Farce, ja, aber eine echte Demokratie hat es sowieso noch nie gegeben,
und wenn sie zur Farce gemacht wird, bedeutet das nur, daß das »Spiel«
etwas offener »gestaltet« wird, d.h. offener gezeigt wird,
daß es nicht um Demokratie, sondern um Plutokratie geht. Um ein
bekanntes Sprichwort ein wenig abzuwandeln: Die Demokratie denkt, die
We are a species that has achieved an accelerating doubling of population on a finite planet with finite resources .... **
And a changing climate .... **
A (saved?) planet without any humans and animals, but with perhaps only a bit less , with much electricity (5G, 6G and more) on and around (satellites) the planet? That does not mean a saved Earth, but does mean the end of all humans and of all other higher animals, because they belonged to the Earth and had a right of being on the Earth. The Earth should not be a planet for machines. Machines have no rights. Only living beings can have rights. If the machines take over, then this does mean that the planet Earth is dead too. Why should we fight for a dead Earth? ** **