1611) Alf, 01.04.2022, 01:37, 14:41, 14:54, 14:57, 15:20, 17:24, 19:08, 20:14, 23:59, 23:59, (8613-8622)

The United States, for example, makes sure that in Old-Europe everyone is ashamed as soon as he loves his country or - even worse - his people. In the United States itself, however, the country and the people should continue to be loved or just left. If one said in Old-Europe to leave Old-Europe, who does not love it, one would be exposed to the left-wing agitation directed by the USA: „right extremism“, „fight against the right-wing“, „Nazi“ and so on. That behind this there is nothing else than a geostrategy to keep the Old-Europeans down, so that the US-Americans can be free in everything they do, is only unclear to such people who cannot even reach IQ 10.

The US-Americans are so arrogant, must be so arrogant, because otherwise they will lose their position of world power. But they will lose it anyway - either in the short term or in the medium to long term. They don't want to give up power, of course - they'd rather bomb away the rest of all human beings or kill them in some other way.

So, with regard to the Russian-Ukrainian war, one can be on one side or the other from the outset. This question, on which side one stands, is quite also a philosophical one, i.e. also and perhaps even particularly an ethical one. A democrat can never love a world power, in fact not even tolerate it. This is also true for any other representative of a form of rule, e.g. for an aristocrat or a monarch. It just does not apply to the one who has the world power. And because everyone who has the world power does not want to give it away but has to expand it in order to be able to keep it, others who have the possibility will want to oust the respective world power ruler. This has happened constantly in the history of mankind.

This Russian-Ukrainian war, which is a proxy war, is not about the question whether the USA or Russia will win it, but whether the geostrategy of the USA or the geostrategy of Russia will be successful and lead to the fact that China will replace the USA as a world power either quite soon or only later.

If one wants to judge the matter neutrally, then one must first remove the propaganda carried out by the media of the USA, by which above all Old-Europe is affected, because it is to be kept down. If this propaganda would be removed, the USA would immediately have Old-Europe as an enemy, because then most Old-Europeans would know how much they have been oppressed by the USA since 1945.

So - from the point of view of the USA - this propaganda of the media of the USA must be continued, even enormously strengthened, in order to be able to achieve the same result for Old-Europe in the future as from 1945 until today.

The Chinese are planning a new Silk Road, partly it is already built. Their intention is to dominate the whole of Eurasia and also Africa. Their propaganda in this regard is already underway.

If China will replace the USA as a world power, America would be only an island far away from Eurasia - at least from the point of view of the Old-Europeans and the rest of Europeans (Russians not included). This is what the U.S. is most afraid of: an alliance between Germany and Russia would then be possible again - as before 1914 - which England and the U.S. have tried again and again to prevent - since 1914 with success. ** **

Again: That behind this there is nothing else than a geostrategy to keep the Old-Europeans down, so that the US-Americans can be free in everything they do, is only unclear to such people who cannot even reach IQ 10. (See: ** **). An example: If Trump is IQ 45, then Peter Kropotkin is IQ 3.

It's not my fault if you don't understand this.

Copied post in another thread.

Copied post in another thread.

Try to read these books (before you open your mouth too wide next time):

@ Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3).

You are always insultuing people, for example Trump and many ILP members.

Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) loves the USA? Okay, thus: Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) is a nazi!

Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) supports Ukrainian nazis? Okay, thus: Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) is a nazi!

It's just funny and very typical that Peter Kropotkin (IQ 3) as a right-winger (nazi) always accuses others of being right-wingers (nazis).

The quiz is a test.

Now the most important two questions on this subject of suffering::

1.) Who will suffer the most from the sanctions as a result?
Answer: All those whose assets are less than one billion U.S. dollars. And consequently, those who have the least assets will suffer the most.

2.) Who is to blame for this disaster of suffering?
Answer: All those whose wealth is more than one billion US dollars. That's the private side, which affects people from the digital-financial complex. And on the public government side, it's just the states that have the most government power. The US has had the most power since the end of World War 2! In addition, the digital-financial complex resides mainly in the USA and has made the public government side dependent on it, and since this takes place mainly in the USA, the respective government of the USA is affected by the blame for the disaster to a much higher degree than it already is without the influence of the digital-financial complex.

A bit of ethics.

In the Anglophone countries (the so-called „5 Eyes“) the mendacious, dishonest moral is that you never have to have a guilty conscience because „you are good“ (? ?), you are „in God’s own country“ (? ?). What an insane presumption ()! n the rest of the world it is exactly the opposite: not mendacious, but honest. There, you are only good if you have examined your conscience before every action and are sure that it is a good conscience.

This refers, as I said, to the morals, the ethics of certain countries. This does not mean that every person acts exactly according to these moral, ethical rules in the respective country; but it means that these rules are predominant in the respective country.

We would do well to bring the moral, ethical rules in Anglophone countries („5 Eyes“) in line with the moral, ethical rules in the rest of the world.

1612) Alf, 02.04.2022, 00:12; Sleyor Wellhuxwell, 02.04.2022, 01:03; Alf, 02.04.2022, 14:45, 14:46, 15:00, 17:18, 17:57 (8623-8629)

It is useless to talk to you (**). You are really too stupid - just IQ 3 or even less!

I don't feel like wasting my time on such a stupid person.

Alf wrote:

„Is the Russian-Ukrainian War the prelude to a new World War?“ ** **

Yes, it is. This world war can be prevented, but that it will happen is less likely than the reverse.

Nation against nation, ethnic group against ethnic group, right against left, non-whites against whites, Muslims against Christians, women against men, young against old, foreigners against nationals, vaccinated against unvaccinated, Putin-understanders against Ukraine-Nazi-supporters, climate lie against the truth, liars and corrupt (conspirators) against the truth enlighteners like real historians (recently branded as conspiracy theorists). All are to be brought by means of fear that they agree to the largest dictatorship of the world history or, if they do not do that, are killed, if they are not already dead by vaccination, war and every kind of chaos anyway.

The following graphic shows roughly how the balance of power is distributed.

It is easy to find out who has the most to say. Money has always been the most powerful. Since the 1970s, however, the digital complex has been added, and since the 1990s, partly due to the internet, it has become as powerful as Black Rock, the most powerful asset management of the financial complex. Politics has always been bought and therefore susceptible to blackmail.

Now, moreover, at least 99% of all people are losing their self-determination because they have to leave all their money and all their data to the globalist rulers.

„Operation Overlord“ - one of many examples:

German rocket scientists (aerospace engineers): Wernher von Braun and his team at Fort Bliss, Texas, USA, 1945. Abducted and blackmailed (many of them were in the NSDAP and SS, e.g. also Wernher von Braun).

Urwrong wrote:

„The world doesn't want Transexual faggotry pushed onto their children, nor does the world population want mandated experimental gene-modifying "vaccines" forced into their blood. The peons of the world are agitated about the openness of their new "Transhuman" slavery. People will rebel.“ **

I hope that people will rebel. But the globalists go relatively slowly, so slowly that people don't notice the fraud (although people like Peter Kropotkin and many others would never notice the fraud anyway). At some point the bag will be closed. Then it is too late for a rebellion (see: Kropotkin again - but this time the real, the historical one: Pyotr Kropotkin - and other communists who did not notice how the others, the more intelligent totalitarians, took them by surprise).

Truth dies first. Hope dies last.

We must enlighten the masses!
-------------------------------------------------------

Power relations in the years 2000 and 2020 in comparison:

2000:		2020:

Which 4 of the today's global players have increased the most in percentage terms in the 20 years from 2000 to 2020? (1.) Digital Financial Complex of the West; (2.) People's Republic of China; (3.) India; (4.) Russia.

How does this fit with what we are observing right now in the Russian-Ukrainian war and in the signs that China is giving off? Well, we have Ukraine and the West supporting Ukraine materially and financially on the one side and Russia and China supporting Russia economically (see contracts for the supply of natural gas, oil and raw materials to China and the settlement of this business in roubles and yuan) on the other side, which will probably be joined in the future, if the war drags on, by Iran, Pakistan, perhaps also India. In addition, the West's Digital Finance Complex has made asset management deals with China.

The question of which side of the two warring parties one is on is therefore related to many other problems and constellations. Particularly problematic is the assignment of the West's Digital Finance Complex, which by no means necessarily has to be found on the Western side alone, perhaps even more on the anti-Western side, but perhaps not.

A conversation between a globalist from the highest level of the upper class and an average earthling from the middle level of the middle class.

Globalist: „Living in a house is not good for the climate! You know: Global warming!“
Earthling: „Where am I supposed to live? Outside? In the forest?“
Globalist: „That would be best for the climate.“
Earthling: „Am I allowed to make a fire?“
Globalist: „No, unless you get fire from one of my nuclear and coal power stations. My asset manager just bought all nuclear and coal power stations for me.“
Earthling: „What will happen to my house? Will it be torn down?“
Gloabist: „No, it would be much too valuable for that. My asset manager just bought it for me. And also consider that you have to live alone because of global warming! No wife, no children, no pets! - Goodbye!“

The globalist, he is called a „philanthropist“ by the mass media, goes back to his huge and beautiful baroque castle (connected to a rocket station - because the globalist likes to holiday on the moon sometimes), while the earthling is on his way to the stone age - happily.

The earthling's name could be, for example, Peter Kropotkin, by the way.

Tasavallan Presidentti (Eero Raittinen, Pekka Pöyry, Vesa Aaltonen, Jukka Talonen, Heikki Virtanen), „Caught from the Air“, 1974.

Enjoy it!

The singer of the band is singing a bit in English - sorry ! -, but the band is from Finland and reminds me of the North of Europe in 1974.

I like it very much!

1613) Great Again, 24.04.2022, 01:28; Kultur, 24.04.2022, 17:30, 18:04; Great Again, 24.04.2022, 20:28, 23:43 (8630-8634)

However, the so-called „Boomer Generation“ is now far beyond the median age, so has been part of the older half of the population for a long time, and this means that they also react strongly to attacks on health, and since „Covid 19“ relies on fear to exploit the middle class (carrier of all achievement!) more than ever before (think of the consequences due to the lockdowns: many companies are broke!).

Nevertheless, I do not only want to excuse the „Boomer Generation“. But taking into account the factors of age and fear is important. Isn't it?

The side effects and consequential damages caused by the vaccination against „Covid 19“ are enormous.

The example Mags (**) gave is not an isolated case. There are many such cases.

Anfang wrote:

„Gotta mobilize every group under the control of the one kraken to push for WW3.“ **

It seems to be a ping-pong game between fear-mongering and seriousness-mongering. In any case, there are stalling tactics at play. They need time for certain agenda goals, such as the conversion from cash to digital central bank money, which is still in the testing phase and can and will only be offered after the big chaos anyway, because people won't just accept it, but during the big chaos they will perceive it as „liberation from the big chaos“.

At first, money defeats politics and the economy (today understood as the real economy). But it is defeated by blood at the end of the cultural cycle. This happens in the „time of the fighting states“, the time between Napoleonism and Caesarism, in which - as said - first the money wins, but at the end the blood, so that the first becomes the second Caesarism, i.e. from primal Caesarism becomes Caesarist monarchy (Augustus called it „principate“, but it was what we know from history as the Roman Empire, which, by the way, underwent a new edition after the fall of Rome: Frankish Empire, Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation - from „Caesar“ [Latin] to „Kaiser“ [German]).

Urwrong wrote:

„The 80-100 year phenomenon in History, that »history repeats«, is due to the fact that after 85 years, those alive during the Calamities and Disasters of the previous generations die-off from old age, and Wisdom/Experience gets lost in the cycle. This means that the »Millennial«Generation, and »Gen Z«, along with the new »Gen Alpha«, all do not have serious understanding or comprehension of the disasters of the Eugenics movements in the 20th Century. Because of this lost wisdom, that the Boomers underestimate and gloss-over, Eugenics has now come back into great power, as it did in the 1920s. The New Eugenicist Movement has latched itself onto Big Pharma, and used this Covid-19 Pandemic scare as the means to return to power.“ **

Eugenics has never gone away since its beginning, it has only hidden itself sometimes more, sometimes less. Today it hides again a little less, i.e. it appears a little more emphasized than in the last decades. But it has never been gone or even „defeated“. Eugenics is a huge business. For that reason alone, it will not be abandoned. On the contrary, it will continue to gain influence, whether hidden or unhidden.

Eugenics has primarily connected with the digital complex, or conversely, the digital complex has put a lot of money into eugenics. This is really new, because the digital complex has not been around long. The first computer was built by Konrad Zuse in 1941. The era of digitalization means the networking of computers into networks up to the internet, so it began in the 1960s.

Urwrong wrote:

„Big Pharma is culpable.“ **

Yes. But others too, for example the digital complex (includinig all its organisations and foundations), the financial complex (includinig all its organisations and foundations), the energy complex, the food complex, the political complex (including the military complex and the secret services), the science complex and - last but not least - the media complex. They and the pharmaceutical complex belong together as one criminal complex.

Urwrong wrote:

„Now that the slave-castes across Earth, the peons, have demonstrated blind-faith and blind-trust in Big Pharma, and blindly injecting any & every »vaccine« offered to them, Eugenicists will use this in future »pandemics« and »outbreaks« which world governments now view as great opportunity for political gain and absolute control (Totalitarianism) over the masses.

Simply declare a »Pandemic« and »Outbreak«, then offer »Vaccines«, and the masses will beg Big Pharma (Trillion-dollar industry) to inject them with experimental cocktail juices.

History has a sense of Justice and Revenge - totalitarian regimes always take the bait of absolute power and believe in their own Hubris.

Unfortunately, if the new generations are interested to learn, what happened in the 1930s and 1940s, with regards to Eugenics?

All the »Liberal-Leftists« who declared »NEVER AGAIN!!!« to genocide and eugenics ... have unveiled themselves as spineless victims, desperate for power, who have no moral integrity, and cannot be trusted in the slightest. Thus, History is doomed to Repeat, yet again.“ **

The slogan „NEVER AGAIN“ is only a rhetorical slogan in order to get more power. It has NEVER had anything to do with the subject itself.

Globalists currrently prefer liberal-leftists for their goals. Both are the current actors of totalitarianism. Their script was published by Klaus Schwab in 2020 (written before 2020): „The Great Reset“.

History repeats somehow anyway.

Did he (**) actually go to school once?

He (**) is still on the preschool level.

1614) Great Again, 27.04.2022, 01:18, 01:37, 02:08, 19:10, 19:38, 20:14; 20:40; 20:59; 21:35; 23:28 (8635-8634)

The following text is about probabilities.

We are still in „autumn“, but already not far away from „winter“.

Let us take two guys and call one „S.“, because he is sixty or seventy years old, and the other „T.“, because he is twenty or thirty years old.

It is very likely that T. makes the shaping of the future more dependent on politics than on economics, especially finance, and accordingly favors certain political parties; earlier, e.g., in the 19th century and for the most part also in the first half of the 20th century, these tended to be parties that we would today call „right-wing parties“; in the 20th century this is gradually reversed, so that from the second half onward it is more likely to be parties that we are used to calling „left-wing parties“.

In the case of S., however, it is rather the other way around. He rather lets the economy, especially the financial economy, shape the future, so that for him the political parties play almost no role, because they are bought by the money powers. Money cares about parties only when they can be bought, otherwise it doesn't care about them - they can do what they want: the main thing is that the cash register rings.

With age one becomes wiser, but nevertheless it is also, even if not so often, the case that T. can also already know what S. knows, and S. still does not know what T. already knows. Well, you know: it is the probability that confirms my above statement.

And there is also an argument from the more objective side that proves both S. and T. right. For the facts known to us from history also confirm that in certain times politics dominates money and in other, again certain times money dominates politics.

But what is really the case today?

I say that we are currently witnessing how money, having already dominated politics for a relatively long time, is now in its last gasps. That is why it is fighting back, at all levels, in all areas, because it has bought them all. That is why politics now has the opportunity to dominate money again - as it did before - for a long time.

Even then, if no suitable person should be found in politics for this, money would have to give up its dominance. The money people would then have to transform themselves into politicians. However it will come: money as a dominant power is about to come to an end.

Since the 1960s, however, there has been a problem that never existed before in history: the digitality of data. This is truly a novelty in history. Or have archaeologists or historians of prehistory found ancient computers that were networked together? No!

So S. is right about the current situation with the money dying off, and T., however, is right about all times before and after the rule of the money. The question is only whether S. and T. know these historical facts, their statements thus this connection contain or not - if not, then merely S. would be right, but only concerning the history of the last approximately 2 centuries as well as the present and some years of the future.

If higher living beings are „in a tight corner“, they lash out more and more. Staged „assaults“, „wars (also world wars)“, „crashs“, „mass migrations“, „total crashs“, „Covid-19“ and many other signs show that the current rulers of this planet - the globalists - are „in a tight corner“. This signs are no signs of strength and also no signs of harmlessness, they are signs of weakness and also signs of danger.

We are currently in the historical phase where „weak men create hard times“, but already not far from the next historical phase where „hard times create strong men“.

Historical Cycle:

Climatical Cycle and Historical Cycle:

We are still in „autumn“, but already not far away from „winter“.

I think that the Digital Financial Complex of the West (**|**) shows us a sign of weakness. ** **

Meno wrote:

„(CNN)Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley told CNN's Jim Sciutto on Tuesday that the entire »global international security order« put in place after World War II is at stake if Russia gets away »cost-free« following its invasion of Ukraine. .... »If this is left to stand, if there is no answer to this aggression, if Russia gets away with this cost-free, then so goes the so-called international order, and if that happens, then we're entering into an era of seriously increased instability«, Milley said.“ **

There are several errors in these statements.

1.) It is a historically proven fact that nations have often been provoked until they had no other recourse but to strike back. To then call this "invasion" shows a lack of knowledge of history and a lack of knowledge of human nature.

2.) The „global international security order“created after World War II, of which Milley speaks, is after all that of the so-called „Cold War“, i.e., the most horrific of the stellar wars (preferably on territories outside the Western bloc and the Eastern bloc).

3.) A „so-called international order“ can therefore not perish at all. Because Milley means the so-called „global international security order“ of the so-called „Cold War“ (see: 2.)), and this was now guaranteed no „order“, but a disorder, namely the very disorderly proxy wars - mostly in the „Third World“.

These three mistakes are serious mistakes, but of course the brainwashed don't notice them, and Milley's whole „argumentation“ is based on these mistakes, so it is propaganda, and since Milley knows or at least can know these mistakes, it is a lying propaganda: he says wrong things on purpose.

I am not saying this because I am pro-Russia. True, I am not in favor of Ukraine either. But I am for justice. And it is a fact that NATO has been militarily supporting Ukraine's provocations since 2004, or at the latest since 2014, in order to force Russia to go to war, in order to be able to change the government, from which the United States can then - once again - profit.

The Digital-Financial Complex of the West (mentioned by Alf) is the ruler of the world to which all other global players must listen, including the Military Complex of the West. The states of the West are no longer sovereign. In the East it is different.

Putin has done a lot in the first years since the beginning of his presidency in 2000 to be able to do business with the West. The West has arrogantly rejected Putin - there was one exception: the German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder; but he has also had to pay dearly for this: Vote of no confidence and subsequent loss of his chancellorship, because no other party wanted to form a coalition with the SPD anymore (good job, secret service!). Behind all this is the geostrategy that has been existing since the 19th century: Preventing an alliance between Germany and Russia at any price (that's why Nord Stream 2 has been abandoned now).

After it became clear to Putin that he would not be able to do anything with Europe - i.e.: Germany - he turned to China. Does Milley, does Biden or anyone else in the USA seriously believe that the sanctions will hit Russia or China so hard that they will capitulate? — Europe has to pay the whole bill once again!

Alf wrote:

„If China will replace the USA as a world power, America would be only an island far away from Eurasia - at least from the point of view of the Old-Europeans and the rest of Europeans (Russians not included). This is what the U.S. is most afraid of: an alliance between Germany and Russia would then be possible again - as before 1914 - which England and the U.S. have tried again and again to prevent - since 1914 with success. ** **

“ ** **

Meno wrote:

„My implication was right with You, until the no sides affirmation was made. A neutrality is impossible nowedays , as can be ascertained from all the »neutral« countries showing otherwise (Benelux and Switzerland)

As far as propaganda goes, there the thin line between fact and fiction is near to the imperishable mark.“ **

„Benelux“ means: Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg. These three countries were and are militarily NOT neutral.

Switzerland is still militarily neutral. Or have you heard anything about Switzerland joining NATO? I hope not, because that would really be a case of war!

Probably you meant Sweden and Finland. Don't you? But even these two are FORCED to give up their military neutrality. This happens NOT FREELY.

Putin is too weak to save us.

Great Again wrote:

Putin has done a lot in the first years since the beginning of his presidency in 2000 to be able to do business with the West. The West has arrogantly rejected Putin - there was one exception: the German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder; but he has also had to pay dearly for this: Vote of no confidence and subsequent loss of his chancellorship, because no other party wanted to form a coalition with the SPD anymore (good job, secret service!). Behind all this is the geostrategy that has been existing since the 19th century: Preventing an alliance between Germany and Russia at any price (that's why Nord Stream 2 has been abandoned now).

After it became clear to Putin that he would not be able to do anything with Europe - i.e.: Germany - he turned to China. Does Milley, does Biden or anyone else in the USA seriously believe that the sanctions will hit Russia or China so hard that they will capitulate? — Europe has to pay the whole bill once again!

Alf wrote:

»If China will replace the USA as a world power, America would be only an island far away from Eurasia - at least from the point of view of the Old-Europeans and the rest of Europeans (Russians not included). This is what the U.S. is most afraid of: an alliance between Germany and Russia would then be possible again - as before 1914 - which England and the U.S. have tried again and again to prevent - since 1914 with success. ** **

« ** **

“ ** **

Russia no longer has any choice but to submit to China.

Who is to blame when one side constantly provokes in order to finally have the war, so that a regime change can once again be made in enemy territory: the provoked or the provoker?

If I’m asking you (**) this, it’s not because you’re an U.S. citizen, but because you’re posting in a forum that’s supposed to be about philosophy.

Have a nice day, by the way.

Ultimately, Russia must and will submit to China both militarily (in modern terms, politically) and economically. Actually, it has already done so. What else should it do? The West does not want it, and since Western and Central Europe, also belong to the West, I can only say that it is a huge mistake to leave Russia to the Chinese and to give up doing business with Russia.

A walk between the columns to a „black hole“.

Great.

1615) Kultur, 10.05.2022, 01:04, 01:11; Kathrina, 10.05.2022, 14:40, 18:00, 18:20 (8645-8649)

It is completely intentional to discriminate against Whites, to hostile them, to wage war against them, to oppress them, to make them disappear. And this intention comes not only from non-whites. It also comes from whites. Anti-whiteism (anti-Europeanism) is growing more and more everywhere. In the meantime, none of the anti-whites is afraid to make this known openly and loudly.

One should always ask oneself: Whom does this serve? (Cui bono?) And one should not forget in the investigation to ask also about the way, which the money takes thereby: Follow the money, in order to find out, who it is, whom all this serves. Take into account also that digitalization is a technique - a white one, of course ! - which, after having stored all our data, is supposed to turn us into beings in which the digital data and the biology are fused, and in case of resistance of these beings, to simply turn them off with a „click“.

We have a responsibility, first of all to ourselves. What is true in the individual must also be true in the community. So we have to live up to our responsibility and protect ourselves and our descendants - just as the non-whites do it with great naturalness, but want to forbid us to do it as well.

And do not forget: It was only we Whites who made all technical, economic and other achievements possible at all for the White-haters (racists!). All non-whites would still be living in completely pre-modern times today if it hadn't been for us whites. And exactly this is probably the main reason for the white hatred, the racism against whites, the anti-whiteism.

Es freut mich, eine Person (**) aus meinem Heimatland hier begrüßen zu dürfen. Herzlich willkommen!

Urwrong wrote:

„Adults are having a conversation now, PK.

Return to the kiddy table.“ **

Kathrina wrote:

„Peter Kropotkin wrote:

»Arminius wrote:

»20% of those who have income pay 80% of the income tax; 20% of the employees of a company are responsible for 80% of the profit; 20% of the products of a supermarket represent 80% of the sales; 20% of the scientists get 80% of the quotations, 20% of the scientists write 80% of the scientific texts. And just: 80% of the links on the internet point to 20% of the webpages. So the 80%/20% distribution concerns the world wide web as well. 20% of all internet links attrac 80% of all internet links.

80% of all ILP posts exist because of the fact that 20% of all ILP posts exist. 20% of all ILP posts deliver 80% of all really philosophical (which are few) ILP posts. And if we assume that the number of the ILP main-posters (those ILP members who are mainly posting, regardless in which of the ILP subforums) is about 40, then 32 (80%) out of 40 (100%) main-posters post on ILP because of 8 (20%) out of 40 (100%) main-posters. This also means that this 8 ILP members are the only ones who really deserve to be called „philosophers“. But perhaps the number of the ILP main-posters is not 40, but 20, so that merely 4 ILP members are the only ones who really deserve to be called 'philosophers'.‹ ** **

Besides me, I wonder who the other three are?« **

Here are the other three:

“ ** **

Kathrina wrote:

„Alf wrote:

»Peter Kropotkin is IQ2 ....« ** **

Https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop ... 0#p2689160.“ ** **

- Eivør Pálsdóttir, Tròdlabùndin (Trøllabundin) -

- Haindling (H.-J. Buchner, H.-J. Braun, M. Braun, P. Enderlein, R. Kürvers, R. Raschner), Du Depp, 1983. -

Klaus Schwab is the one who expands the power of the globalists with his knowledge of technology and economics and trains helpers, i.e. leaders and shapers, for this purpose, among other things, in his World Economic Forum. This Klaus Schwab has said once that Putin was his favorite pupil, and Putin has lost praising words also about Klaus Schwab. Now both of them are keeping a low profile with such statements.

In any case, the Ukrainian-Russian war, like almost every war in history, is staged. Don't you believe it? It is very suitable for interrupting supply chains, similar to the „lockdown“ in Shanghai and Shenzhen or even in Hamburg: the ships for export simply do not sail anymore and in this way ensure the absence of certain raw materials and products, i.e. for enormous price increases and in more and more countries for an enormous increase in starvation deaths.

1616) Herr Schütze, 12.05.2022, 01:07; Otto, 12.05.2022, 14:38, 14:40, 15:59, 16:20; (8650-8659)

Ich schätze Wolfgang Effenberger sehr. Er war Soldat, und sein Kampf um die Werte des Lebens, und zwar natürlich desjenigen Lebens, wie wir es (noch) kennen, ist tapfer wie der eines Soldaten, und zwar desjenigen Soldaten, wie wir ihn (noch) kennen, und wie der eines noch nicht vor der „göttlichen“ Macht der Globalisten eingeknickten Wissenschaftlers, in seinem Fall also eines Geschichtswissenschaftlers, wie wir ihn (noch) kennen, aber nicht mehr kennen sollen. Darum möchte ich mich bei ihm für seinen Fassadenkratzer-Gastbeitrag (**) bedanken.

„Die plutokratische Transformation (1913-2030)“ - dieser von Effenberger gewählte Titel für seinen Gastbeitrag ist bestens gewählt, wissen die meisten Menschen doch gar nicht, daß diese plutokratische Transformation tatsächlich 1913 (am 23.12.) begann, obwohl schon lange vorher geplant gewesen, und nach dem Willen dieser Plutokraten 2030 enden soll - übrigens auch nach dem Willen der Digitalherrscher, die es vor der Digitalisierung der Welt noch gar nicht gab. Die Digitalherrscher bilden mit den Geldherrschern ein „Duumvirat“. Da der Denkherrscher Klaus Schwab mit seiner Denkfabrik ebenfalls eingebunden ist, kann man auch von einem „Triumvirat“ sprechen.

Als Vorwand, um die Geldschöpfung noch weiter zu steigern, dient übrigens nicht nur „Covid-19“, sondern mittlerweile auch der ukrainisch-russische Krieg, und stets dabei ist ja seit langem schon, mal mehr im Hintergrund, mal mehr im Vordergrund und zukünftig wahrscheinlich sowohl im Vordergrund als auch im Zentrum, das „Klima“, die „Erderwärmung“. Es sind dieselben Leute, die ständig von der „Überbevölkerung“ und der darum notwendigen „Senkung der Bevölkerungszahl“ reden, die sagen, sie könnten das Leben dieser Bevölkerung retten: MIT EINEM IMPFSTOFF (!). Es sind dieselben Leute, die permanent den Planeten Erde ausgebeutet haben (und zwar entweder direkt selbst oder indirekt über andere, die sie anschließend mittels Spekulationen an der Börse ebenfalls ausgebeutet haben), die sagen, sie könnten „die Welt retten“, „das Klima retten“ u.s.w.. Es sind dieselben Leute, die seit langer Zeit alles dafür getan haben, um sich vom Rest der Menschheit immer mehr zu unterscheiden, die Schere zwischen sich als den Supermächtigen und Superreichen und dem immer ohnmächtiger und immer ärmer werdenden Rest (99,9999%) der Menschheit immer weiter auseinander zu bringen, die von der menschlichen „Gleichheit“ reden. Es sind dieselben Leute, die sich unbedingt für Abtreibung und darum auch für „Gender“ aussprechen und das dann noch mit kaum zu überbietendem Zynismus „Selbstbestimmung“ nennen, die sagen, der Rest der Menschheit solle sich der KI unterordnen und zu etwas werden, was jenseits des Menschseins liegt, zu einem „transhumanen“ Wesen, was auch immer das sein soll, jedenfalls kein menschliches Wesen. Es sind dieselben Leute, die sich wie niemand zuvor in der Weltgeschichte bereichert und also bemächtigt haben, die sagen, der Rest (99,9999%) der Menschheit solle besitzlos und glücklich über die Besitzlosigkeit sein. Es sind dieselben Leute, die allesamt aus dem westlichen Wertesystem (der abendländischen Kultur!) stammen, die sagen: „das westliche Wertesystem wird bis zum Zerreißen belastet“. Deswegen also der immer stärker gewordene, rigorose, widerliche Haß bestimmter, weil gehirngewaschener Westler gegenüber Westlern - ein Rassismus, der sich gegen sich selbst wendet und von diesen Rassisten nicht einmal bemerkt wird, weil er eben ein durch Gehirnwäsche erzeugter ist.

Und: Wie ich schon in meiner „Neujahrsansprache“ gesagt habe: „Die Propaganda macht sicherlich auch so etwas wie Demokratie zur Farce, ja, aber eine echte Demokratie hat es sowieso noch nie gegeben, und wenn sie zur Farce gemacht wird, bedeutet das nur, daß das »Spiel« etwas offener »gestaltet« wird, d.h. offener gezeigt wird, daß es nicht um Demokratie, sondern um Plutokratie geht. Um ein bekanntes Sprichwort ein wenig abzuwandeln: Die Demokratie denkt, die Plutokratie lenkt.
Das Volk (der »Demos«) ist noch nie an der Macht gewesen.“ ** **

Wolfgang Effenberger hat gute Arbeit geleistet - auch früher schon mit seinen Arbeiten über die wahren Drahtzieher der Kriege und Weltkriege. Die Plutokraten - die Geldherrscher aus dem Finanzkomplex (neu ist an diesem reichsten und also mächtigsten Komplex der Weltgeschichte nur, daß er von etwas Neuem, dem Digitalkomplex, und von Schwabs Oberdenktank unterstützt wird) - sind nicht gegen Krisen, wie viele der Gehirngewaschenen glauben, sondern ganz ausdrücklich für Krisen, denn Krisen sind für sie eine der größten Einnahmequellen, insbesondere Kriege und ganz besonders Weltkriege.

Manche Spieler aus dem digitalfinanziellen Komplex haben in der Zeit zwischen Mitte März 2020 und Mitte September 2021 ihren Reichtum um mehr als 100% vermehrt. Sie haben in eineinhalb Jahren geschafft, wofür sie zuvor mehrere Jahrzehnte gebraucht haben. Die „wundersame“ Reichtumsvermehrung der Oberschicht geschieht auf Kosten der Mittelschicht (Leistungsträger), die es wohl bald gar nicht mehr geben wird (wie in steinzeitlichen und kommunistischen Verhältnissen eben), wenn die Oberschicht mit ihrem extremen Wahnsinn weiterhin Erfolg haben wird.

In lingusitics, especially language acquisition and language development research (language history research), there is no doubt that first there must be the ability for the production of speech sounds, so the sounds are the first. The linguists also call the sounds „phones“ to distinguish them from the „phonemes“, which play a role when sounds can be determined as what phonemes are: smallest segmentable phonetic units abstracted from the sound stream of speech with potential meaning-distinguishing function.  –  In the development and acquisition of language, therefore, this first precondition must be given.

The second thing that comes into play is the „morph“. It is the smallest meaning-bearing phonetic segment of an utterance, which is not yet classified as representative of a „morpheme“. A morpheme is an abstract (theory-related) unit. It is represented phonetically-phonologically (see above) by a morph as the smallest meaning-bearing but not yet classified phonetic segment. (Note: We still have not arrived at the word!).

Only now do we get to the word. The word is already a more complex entity than those from the field of phonetics and phonology and the field of morphology and graphology. Decisive was first the potential meaning-distinguishing function (see above: 1st paragraph) and then the smallest meaning-bearing phonetic segment of an utterance (see above: 2nd paragraph). Now this carrying of meaning becomes more and more complex (see next paragraph).

The next level is the sentence. About the sentence, many still know from school what it means. In linguistics, since 1957 and especially since 1965, Noam Chomsky and his theory of syntax have gained acceptance. I will not go into this in detail now, because that would mean that I would have to present an entire basic study in linguistics now.

What is relatively new, but on the other hand not really new, is text linguistics. Roughly speaking, the text can be understood as an extended, enlarged sentence. After all, when one encounters language for the first time, one does not want to produce only one sound (see 1st paragraph), nor to understand it in combination with others only morphologically (see 2nd paragraph), nor necessarily as only one word (see 3rd paragraph), and perhaps not even as only one sentence (see 4th paragraph); but one wants to say a whole text, to say something about the world, without having to limit oneself to one sentence, one word, one morph(em) and one phon(em). And this starts very early. You can observe this in children (I did it often during my studies and also privately with my children).

Kathrina wrote:

„

- Eivør Pálsdóttir, Tròdlabùndin (Trøllabundin) -

- Haindling (H.-J. Buchner, H.-J. Braun, M. Braun, P. Enderlein, R. Kürvers, R. Raschner), Du Depp, 1983. -

“ ** **

Thanks for posting Haindling, Kathrina. I like Haindling.

- Haindling (H.-J. Buchner, H.-J. Braun, M. Braun, P. Enderlein, R. Kürvers, R. Raschner), Spinn I, 1985. -

Hubert von Goisern with his yodel music. What about that?

- Hubert von Goisern, Heast as nit, 1992 -

Bob wrote:

„We are a species that has achieved an accelerating doubling of population on a finite planet with finite resources ....“ **

Well, but „an accelerating doubling of population on a finite planet with finite resources“: we had these problems before, too. Why does the reckoning have to come from above now, by that I mean that the ones up there - the globalists - were the ones who exploited everything on this planet, even those who were not as successful with the exploitation as the globalists themselves.

Bob wrote:

„And a changing climate ....“ **

„And a changing climate ...“? Well, because the water is up to the neck of the globalists, they suddenly come up with the „narrative“ of the „changing climate“. The globalists know that the financial system is at the end and therefore they have to expropriate those who have really achieved something economically, the achievers, in order to get their property. That is behind all these „narratives“, behind „climate change“, behind „Covid-19“, behind the „Ukrainian-Russian war“ and what is still to come. In the end, the super-super-super-rich and super-super-super-powerful globalists (0.0001%) will be on one side and the totally impoverished rest (99.9999%) and probably all the few remaining animals will be on the other side - perhaps even only one very small upper class and only one huge lower class or even two different kinds of a species or even a new - transhuman (!) - „species“! Is that what you want? I do not think so!

A („saved“?) planet without any humans and animals, but with perhaps only a bit less , with much electricity (5G, 6G and more) on and around (satellites) the planet? That does not mean „a saved Earth“, but does mean the end of all humans and of all other „higher“ animals, because they belonged to the Earth and had a right of being on the Earth. The Earth should not be a planet for machines. Machines have no rights. Only living beings can have rights. If the machines take over, then this does mean that the planet Earth is „dead“ too. Why should we fight for a „dead“ Earth?

Why this last war?

Otto wrote:

„A („saved“?) planet without any humans and animals, but with perhaps only a bit less , with much electricity (5G, 6G and more) on and around (satellites) the planet? That does not mean „a saved Earth“, but does mean the end of all humans and of all other „higher“ animals, because they belonged to the Earth and had a right of being on the Earth. The Earth should not be a planet for machines. Machines have no rights. Only living beings can have rights. If the machines take over, then this does mean that the planet Earth is „dead“ too. Why should we fight for a „dead“ Earth?“ ** **

8655

8656

8657

De andere Krant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=jL2C6HHgxvM&feature=emb_logo

„Interview - »Die schrecklichen Kinder der Neuzeit«“

https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=197536&p=2845453#p2845593

https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=197536&p=2845453#p2845453

1617)

1618)

1619)

1620)

==>